The Global Coronavirus (COVID-19) Hysteria

March 15th, 2020

One thing the coronavirus (COVID-19) global ‘crisis’ has proven in the last few weeks is that most people worldwide behave like sheep. A few people panic somewhere, others see this and don’t know exactly what’s going on but decide that they should also panic just to be on the safe side. Monkey see, monkey do. This was especially clear from all the worldwide hoarding of toilet paper. Nobody has any explanation for why they needed to hoard toilet paper except for the fact that they saw others do it too.

Photo by Ashley Ludwig (source)

This is just mass hysteria and there’s nothing rational about it. The COVID-19 coronavirus is just a flu virus. Most people who get sick from it get better within a few days. I’m not saying that people shouldn’t be careful, but the normal best practices and precautions that are relevant during the flu season would have been more than adequate for most people. The only people that have a high risk of serious complications — just like with any other flu — are older people above the age of 70, especially if they also have other underlying health conditions.

Stem cell biologist Dr. Bruce Lipton PhD. had the following to say about this on Facebook (March 12^th 2020):

The world is currently gripped in fear of the scary coronavirus. Let’s first get one fact clear: If you have ever had a cold or flu in your life, odds are that it was the result of a coronavirus infection. Yes, coronaviruses cause colds.

But, we are being programmed with the belief that this particular cold virus is “deadly.” This fear has shut down concerts, conferences, and major public events all over the world. The fear has led to quarantines and closing down of international travel. It has even led to a major scarcity of toilet paper in Australia, were concerned citizens emptied the shelves of this commodity in anticipation that they will be walled up in their homes with this infection.

First, how deadly is this version of the virus? Yes, there have been corona-related deaths reported with the statistics suggesting that ~2% of the infected population dies. Wow! That number is almost 1% more deaths than are attributed to any conventional flu the world experiences. What is misleading is the fear that everyone who carries this virus may die from their cold. This is simply untrue! The health of almost all the victims of this coronavirus was already compromised before they were infected.

For example, the following information was provided by the news in regard to the 6 patients that died of the virus in the state of Washington last week (I added the bold print):

Six people have died in Washington and health officials have identified 18 cases.

Four of the cases in King County were linked to the Life Care nursing facility in Kirkland. More than 50 residents and staff at the facility are being tested.

The deaths announced Monday, according to health officials, included:

A male in his 70s, who lived at LifeCare. He had underlying health conditions and died Sunday.

A female resident of LifeCare in her 70s. She also had underlying health conditions and died Sunday.

A woman in her 80s, who was already reported as in critical condition at EvergreenHealth, died Sunday.

A Snohomish County resident at EvergreenHealth also died but details of that patient have not been given.

Two previously reported deaths included a man in his 70s who had underlying health conditions and had been a resident of LifeCare. He died at EvergreenHealth on Feb. 29. The other was a man in his 50s with underlying health conditions. He was admitted with serious respiratory issues and tested positive for the virus. He died at EvergreenHealth Medical Center in Kirkland.

As emphasized in this report, the health of all those that died with the coronavirus was already compromised. Healthy people get cold and flu symptoms, while those already sick and near death’s door may experience the “Grim Reaper” when infected by the virus. True, sick people are more vulnerable to the virus; healthy people really have nothing to fear.

…

The media (perhaps in conjunction with the pharmaceutical industry) is compromising people’s health using the fear card! This is the result of negative thinking (the nocebo effect) which is the complete opposite of the placebo effect manifest through positive thinking! If you make efforts to stay healthy, with good nutrition, exercise, taking vitamins and supplements, and more importantly, avoiding stress (e.g., the “fear” of the virus), even if you do get infected with the virus, you will likely only end up with a cold and/or slight fever.

And according to The Guardian in “Coronavirus facts: is there a cure and what is the mortality rate of the virus?” (March 11^th 2020):

What is the mortality rate of the new coronavirus?

It is probably about or a bit less than 1%. Much higher figures have been flying about, but the chief medical officer, Chris Whitty, is one of those who believes it will prove to be 1% or lower. The World Health Organization’s director general, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, talked of 3.4%, but his figure was calculated by dividing the number of deaths by the number of officially confirmed cases. We know there are many more mild cases that do not get to hospital and are not being counted, which would bring the mortality rate significantly down.

Deaths are highest in the elderly, with very low rates among younger people, although medical staff who treat patients and get exposed to a lot of virus are thought to be more at risk. But even among the over-80s, 90% will recover.

Sometimes higher death rates are reported in certain parts of the world, and that’s because in those areas more people might have been affected by the disease that are in the high risk categories (such as the elderly). This was especially the case in Italy where many elderly people contracted the virus. As an article on Live Science, “How does the new coronavirus compare with the flu?” (March 6^th 2020) points out:

In the study published Feb. 18 in the China CDC Weekly, researchers found a death rate from COVID-19 to be around 2.3% in mainland China. Another study of about 1,100 hospitalized patients in China, published Feb. 28 in the New England Journal of Medicine, found that the overall death rate was slightly lower, around 1.4%.

Still, the death rate for COVID-19 appears to vary by location and an individual’s age, among other factors. For instance, in Hubei Province, the epicenter of the outbreak, the death rate reached 2.9%; in other provinces of China, that rate was just 0.4%, according to the China CDC Weekly study. In addition, older adults have been hit the hardest. The death rate soars to 14.8% in those 80 and older; among those ages 70 to 79, the COVID-19 death rate in China seems to be about 8%; it’s 3.6% for those ages 60 to 69; 1.3% for 50 to 59; 0.4% for the age group 40 to 49; and just 0.2% for people ages 10 to 39. No deaths in children under 9 have been reported.

On the website of the Center of Infectious Disease Research and Policy (CIDRAP) we read the following in an article titled “Study of 72,000 COVID-19 patients finds 2.3% death rate” (February 24^th 2020):

Researchers from China’s Center for Disease Control and Prevention today describe the clinical findings on more than 72,000 COVID-19 cases reported in mainland China, which reveal a case-fatality rate (CFR) of 2.3% and suggest most cases are mild, but the disease hits the elderly the hardest.

The study, published in JAMA, is the largest patient-based study on the novel coronavirus, which was first connected to seafood market in Wuhan, China, in December, and has since traversed the globe.

Death rate in critically ill: 49% or higher
A total of 72,314 COVID-19 cases, diagnosed through Feb 11 were used for the study. Of the 72,314 cases, 44,672 were classified as confirmed cases of COVID-19 (62%; diagnosis based on positive throat swab samples), 16,186 as suspected cases (diagnosis based on symptoms and exposures only), 10,567 as clinically diagnosed cases (from Hubei province only, diagnoses based on symptoms, including lung x-ray), and 889 as asymptomatic cases (diagnosis by positive test result but lacking typical symptoms).

“Most cases were diagnosed in Hubei Province (75%) and most reported Wuhan-related exposures (86%; ie, Wuhan resident or visitor or close contact with Wuhan resident or visitor,” the authors said.

Eighty-seven percent of patients were aged 30 to 79 years (38,680 cases). This age-group was the most affected by a wide margin, followed by ages 20 to 29 (3,619 cases, or 8%), those 80 and older (1,408 cases, or 3%), and 1% each in ages less than 10 and 10 to 19 years.

Of the confirmed cases, 1,023 patients—all in critical condition—died from the virus, which results in a CFR of 2.3%. The CFR jumped considerably among older patients, to 14.8% in patients 80 and older, and 8.0% in patients ages 70 to 79. Among the critically ill, the CFR was 49.0%.

The global hysteria and completely disproportionate response to what is essentially just a flu doesn’t make sense until you notice the fact that a large part of the media appears to be promoting fear while Big Pharma are hard at work to develop another vaccine to sell to people. In the future when their vaccine is ready, I’m sure that they’ll be pointing back regularly at the global ‘crisis’ of 2020 in order to manipulate people with fear and get them to buy their vaccination poison every year. And those that will refuse their poison will be ridiculed and blamed for any potential outbreak just like the case is today with other diseases like measles.

Like Dr. Lipton mentioned above, and like I discussed before in my post “Vaccination is Ineffective and Dangerous”, the best response to this virus is to make sure your immune system is strong enough to fight it, in which case you get rid of it in a few days just like with any other flu. In fact, in an article on Nine for News titled “Vitamin C successfully used against coronavirus. ‘Cured after only 2 days.'” (March 14^th 2020) we read the following (translated from Dutch):

A medical team from a hospital at Jiaotong University in China has successfully used vitamin C against the coronavirus. In a press statement on the hospital’s website, the team wrote that patients were given high doses of the vitamin. Critical patients admitted to the hospital should be treated with vitamin C as soon as possible, the doctors advise.

Prevents and heals

The treatment enhances the antiviral activity of the immune system and prevents or cures acute pulmonary failure. The Shanghai Medical Association (SMA) in China also advises treating corona patients with high doses of vitamin C. According to the SMA, patients should be given 50 to 100 mg per kilogram of body weight per day via infusion.

Healed after two days

Patients in critical condition need up to 200 mg per kilogram of body weight, according to the medical association. The Chinese authorities brought 50 tons of vitamin C to Hubei and Wuhan province, where the outbreak began. Doctors attached to Daegu hospital in South Korea report similar successes. “All patients and doctors here take vitamin C. Corona patients with symptoms received 30,000 mg per infusion. Some were cured after two days,” said the doctors.

So for me personally, while most people in my area of the world are panicking just like the majority worldwide, I just take the same precautions like I do whenever there’s a seasonal flu outbreak: I stay at home and avoid going out of my house and among people unless it is absolutely required and I make sure I take my vitamins daily. And as we’ve seen above, especially vitamin C is very important when it comes to strengthening your immune system; in fact, the higher the dosage the better. I’ve had a post about vitamin C in my drafts folder for a few years now and I think it’s about time that I finally get back to it and finish it.

Additional Notes

Here’s from the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, “Nutritional Treatment of Coronavirus” (January 30^th 2020):

Abundant clinical evidence confirms vitamin C’s powerful antiviral effect when used in sufficient quantity. Treating influenza with very large amounts of vitamin C is not a new idea at all. Frederick R. Klenner, MD, and Robert F. Cathcart, MD, successfully used this approach for decades. Frequent oral dosing with vitamin C sufficient to reach a daily bowel tolerance limit will work for most persons. Intravenous vitamin C is indicated for the most serious cases.

…

The coronavirus, in acute infections, may be expected to be just as susceptible to vitamin C as all of the other viruses against which it has been proven to be extremely effective. There has never been a documented situation in which sufficiently high dosing with vitamin C has been unable to neutralize or kill any virus against which it has been tested.

Even the common cold is a coronavirus. A “new” opportunistic virus is a not a big surprise. History is full of them.

..

Vitamin C fights all types of viruses. Although the dose should truly be high, even a low supplemental amount of vitamin C saves lives. This is very important for those with low incomes and few treatment options. For example, in one well-controlled, randomized study, just 200 mg/day vitamin C given to the elderly resulted in improvement in respiratory symptoms in the most severely ill, hospitalized patients. And there were 80% fewer deaths in the vitamin C group. [7]

But to best build up our immune systems, we need to employ large, orthomolecular doses of several vital nutrients. The physicians on the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service review board specifically recommend at least 3,000 milligrams (or more) of vitamin C daily, in divided doses. Vitamin C empowers the immune system and can directly denature many viruses. It can be taken as ascorbic acid (which is sour like vinegar), either in capsules or as crystals dissolved in water or juice. It can also be taken as sodium ascorbate, which is non-acidic. To be most effective, it should be taken to bowel tolerance. This means taking high doses several (or many) times each day. See the references below for more information.

Added on March 21st, 2020 at 6:52 pm
Here’s from the New York Post, “New York hospitals treating coronavirus patients with vitamin C” (March 24^th 2020):

Seriously sick coronavirus patients in New York state’s largest hospital system are being given massive doses of vitamin C — based on promising reports that it’s helped people in hard-hit China, The Post has learned.

Dr. Andrew G. Weber, a pulmonologist and critical-care specialist affiliated with two Northwell Health facilities on Long Island, said his intensive-care patients with the coronavirus immediately receive 1,500 milligrams of intravenous vitamin C.

Identical amounts of the powerful antioxidant are then readministered three or four times a day, he said.

Each dose is more than 16 times the National Institutes of Health’s daily recommended dietary allowance of vitamin C, which is just 90 milligrams for adult men and 75 milligrams for adult women.

The regimen is based on experimental treatments administered to people with the coronavirus in Shanghai, China, Weber said.

“The patients who received vitamin C did significantly better than those who did not get vitamin C,” he said.

“It helps a tremendous amount, but it is not highlighted because it’s not a sexy drug.”

Added on March 26th, 2020 at 3:15 pm
Here’s from BR24, “Schwabing chief physician: ‘Corona no more dangerous than influenza'” (February 6^th 2020) translated from German:

According to expert estimates, the risk of infection and mortality of the coronavirus is about as high as that of influenza. The head physician in Munich, who treats German infected persons, has made one thing clear: Corona is by no means more dangerous than influenza.

Chief physician Clemens Wendtner from the Infectiology Clinic at the Munich Schwabing Hospital, where seven of the twelve infected people in Germany are treated, believes that the danger of the corona virus is overestimated.

Schwabing physician sets mortality considerably lower

Wendtner said that the mortality rate in China is two to three percent. But: “We think that is overestimated. We expect the mortality rate to be well below one percent, more likely in the per mille range”. This is a similar figure to influenza. This does not have much to do with a very, very dangerous disease — the coronavirus is by no means more dangerous than influenza. The overestimation is due to the fact that in China only the most severe cases are admitted to hospitals due to capacity bottlenecks; the number of unreported cases is high.

The risk of infection in Germany is very low

Basically, the coronavirus is similarly contagious as the influenza virus — but significantly less infectious than measles. Keeping a distance and washing your hands regularly reduce the risk considerably. Nobody has to wear a face mask in everyday life. “That doesn’t work,” said the doctor, also referring to the extremely low number of infected people in Germany. In contrast to the flu, which affects several hundred thousand people each year, the likelihood of getting corona in this country is very low.

Added on March 28th, 2020 at 12:37 pm
It looks like the reported deaths caused by the coronavirus in Italy cannot be trusted and are being artificially inflated. It’s as if they want to make COVID-19 appear to be much worse than it actually is. Here’s from NRC Handelsblad, “Als Italië het voorland is, wat staat Nederland te wachten?” (March 22^th 2020) translated from Dutch:

The figures are questionable

Angelo Borrelli, the head of Civil Protection, who announces the latest figures every day at 6 p.m., said Saturday night that the 793 new deaths have been caused “by and with” the coronavirus. “We count all the dead, we make no distinction between with and by the coronavirus.” However, one wonders whether these daily figures reflect the situation correctly. The dead are said to have almost all had one or more other diseases, which leaves a question mark as to exactly how deadly the coronavirus is. At the same time, it has become clear that a large number of people who die at home (which is often a retirement home) do not undergo a coronavirus test.

This is similar to what Dr. Peter Duesberg described happened with the HIV virus. To make HIV/AIDS appear to be worse than it actually was, anyone who died from a number of other diseases but was also HIV positive, was counted as someone who died from AIDS. Duesberg can be seen mentioning this in the Stephen Allen film “HIV=AIDS: Fact or Fraud?”.

Added on March 28th, 2020 at 1:00 pm
Dear journalists,

COVID-19 — what does this situation have to do with science?
1. On March 19^th, Roussel et al. pointed out that they see no increased risk of SARS-CoV2 in relation to classic corona viruses, cf.
  - Roussel et al., “SARS-CoV-2: fear versus data.”, Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Mar 19:105947,
    
    “Under these conditions, there does not seem to be a significant difference between the mortality rate of SARS-CoV-2 in OECD countries and that of common coronaviruses (χ2 test, P=0.11). Of course, the major flaw in this study is that the percentage of deaths attributable to the virus is not determined, but this is the case for all studies reporting respiratory virus infections, including SARS-CoV-2.”
    
    “Under these conditions, and all other things being equal, SARS-CoV-2 infection cannot be described as being statistically more severe than infection with other coronaviruses in common circulation.”
    
    “Finally, in OECD countries, SARS-CoV-2 does not seem to be deadlier than other circulating viruses.”
2. On March 26^th, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, em. Professor of Medical Microbiology, criticized, among others with reference to Roussel et al., the disproportionality of the measures taken and the current situation.
  - [German] Open letter by Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi to the German chancellor Dr. Angela Merkel, 26 März 2020,
3. On March 24^th, a summary of the statements of 12 experts was published, who are very critical of the current analysis of the situation and the measures taken, cf.
  - offGuardian, “12 Experts Questioning the Coronavirus Panic”, Mar 24, 2020, with update on March 28^th,
  - offGuardian, “10 MORE Experts Criticising the Coronavirus Panic”, Mar 28, 2020,
4. The numbers from Germany are far(!) below the scandal numbers from Italy and Spain,
  - Coronavirus COVID-19 Global Cases by Johns Hopkins CSSE,
  The ratio of those who died with SARS-CoV2 detection to those who tested positive has been 0.6% – 0.7% for weeks, with the multimorbidity of the deceased being high. It is the same virus as in Italy and Spain, or more precisely, it is the same test.
  
  Lothar Wieler, President of the RKI [Robert Koch Institute, in Germany responsible for COVID-19 monitoring], confirmed in a press conference on March 20^th that all deceased with positive SARS-CoV2 test are considered COVID-19 cases and count as dead in the COVID-19 statistic.
5. The figures for the average age of those who died with SARS-CoV2 detection from Germany (81 years), France (81.2 years), Italy (78.5 years) and in Spain, where 87.5% of the deceased were over 70 years, each with high multimorbidity (in Italy suffered about 50% of the deceased from 3 or more co-morbidities, only approx. 1% had no co-morbidity), are not outside the usual seasonal pattern and show no deviation from the seasonal virus wave.
6. The heavily attacked Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg (MD) has pointed for weeks a lack of deviation from the seasonal virus wave (www.wodarg.com), with reference to current RKI data on respiratory diseases in week 12 in Germany. At the same time, there are signs that SARS-CoV2 has been in England since the end of 2019.
  - Clive Cookson, “Coronavirus may have infected half of UK population — Oxford study”, March 24 2020,
    
    “The Oxford research suggests that Covid-19 reached the UK by mid-January at the latest and perhaps as early as December.”
7. 95% of people with positive SARS-CoV2 test show mild or no symptoms, which alone is very surprising for a supposedly new pathogen of zoonotic origin, cf. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
  The symptoms themselves are largely non-specific.
The current situation can no longer be brought into line with scientific knowledge. However, the overreaction of politics cannot be turned back by so quickly. Science and politics now look helplessly at the test chaos they have caused. It is an unprecedented panic tsunami.

COVID-19 has become the game ball of politics and the media, in Germany as in the world. It is not an epidemic guided by science and based on scientific data, as far as science has this data at all. This policy is carried out on people’s backs.

See on the situation in elderly care,
- [German] Pflegeethik-Initiative, “Nicht Leben und nicht Sterben dürfen”, 26 März 2020
We have no data on the situation of mentally ill people, but the situation should by now defy description.

Politicians worldwide have leaned out of the window so far that there is no way back now. And the fearmongering of the media with hourly news on positive test results contributes to the panic. This has nothing to with science anymore.

Best regards,
Johannes Kreis
Added on March 29th, 2020 at 5:18 pm
In the below video titled “Hospitals during Corona ‘Crisis'” we see examples of the media lying about the so called “crisis” caused by the new coronavirus in countries around the world.

Added on April 4th, 2020 at 12:06 pm
The below video titled “Dr. Bodo Schiffmann talks about COVID-19” by Dr. Bodo Schiffmann was removed by YouTube on March 30^th 2020. Anyone who dares to speak the truth about COVID-19 quickly finds themselves being censored by the big social media platforms on the Internet (I blogged about another example on Medium recently).

Dr. Schiffmann shows that the current mortality rates in Europe give no cause for concern and that the current hysteria is irrational. Furthermore, he discusses an internal message from the German emergency medical service which shows that French doctors are instructed not to treat patients over 80 years of age. Instead, they offer ‘active support in dying’. As mentioned on Wakkere Mensen, imagine paying health insurance all of your life and in the end getting this treatment. What a scam.

Added on April 4th, 2020 at 6:26 pm
Even the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the USA admits that the number of cases and deaths that they report as caused by COVID-19 are unreliable. As stated on their own website:

* Data include both confirmed and presumptive positive cases of COVID-19 reported to CDC or tested at CDC since January 21, 2020, with the exception of testing results for persons repatriated to the United States from Wuhan, China and Japan.

Added on April 6th, 2020 at 12:38 pm
Beate Bahner, specialist lawyer for medical law from Heidelberg, announces that she will take legal action against the Baden-Württemberg Corona Ordinance. Here is a quote translated from German (“Updated press release of the specialist law firm BAHNER of April 3, 2020”, original PDF):

Beate Bahner, specialist lawyer for medical law from Heidelberg, announces that she will take legal action against the Baden-Württemberg Corona Ordinance: The measures taken by the federal and state governments are blatantly unconstitutional and violate a multitude of basic rights of German citizens to an unprecedented extent. This applies to all corona ordinances of the 16 federal states. In particular, these measures are not justified by the Infection Protection Act, which was revised only a few days ago at lightning speed. Weeks of restrictions on going out and contact bans based on the darkest model scenarios (without taking into account factual and critical expert opinions) as well as the complete closure of companies and shops without any evidence of a risk of infection by these shops and businesses are grossly unconstitutional.

This is because the available figures and statistics show that corona infection is harmless in more than 95% of the population […] and therefore does not represent a serious danger to the general public.

…

Sampling of the population is also needed to determine the actual (probably much higher) number of infections and thus the actual (probably many times lower) percentage of serious and very serious cases due to the corona virus. The mortality rate of Covid19 was determined by experts to be only 0.1% (this is one in 1,000 people infected and therefore comparable to a severe flu epidemic). Above all, the autopsy of people who have died from/with corona is urgently needed to determine what these usually old people with usually many diseases actually died from. Furthermore, an honest representation of the death toll is needed, because approximately 2500 people die every day, including 900 people in nursing homes. Every year 900,000 people die in Germany! Therefore, a correct scientific approach and the correct informing of the people is finally needed!

For a Dutch translation, read “CORONA-aanpak is wederrechtelijk”.

Added on April 6th, 2020 at 12:55 pm
The Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (RIVM) in the Netherlands publishes misleading death counts on their website related to the new coronavirus. Here’s an example from their website (translated from Dutch):

01-04-2020 | 2 p.m.

Overview numbers

The total number of positively tested patients: 13,614 (+1,019)
The total number of reported patients admitted (or having been admitted) to the hospital: 5,159 (+447)
The total number of reported deceased patients: 1,173 (+134)

They mention 1173 deaths as of April 1^st 2020, but fail to mention that this includes patients with multimorbidities (or comorbidities). They do publish that information in their full report (PDF), where you can see in Table 5a that from the total number of deaths (1173) only 54 people had just COVID-19, while 750 of them also had one or more of a number of other diseases (such as diabetes, immune deficiency, kidney disease and even chronic lung disease as mentioned in Table 5b). For the remaining 369 people there was no data on whether or not they had comorbidities.

Various news websites, such as the Telegraaf, reported the numbers of deaths mentioned above (1173) without specifying the exact causes, giving the public a very misleading view of the true severity of COVID-19. This is yet another example of how the number of deaths in the media are very unreliable and cause unnecessary panic and hysteria among the public.

Added on April 6th, 2020 at 1:56 pm
Here is yet another example of how the COVID-19 death counts are being inflated to make the so called ‘pandemic’ seem a lot worse than it really is.

Dr. Scott Jensen, a physician and a Minnesota state senator in the USA, was interviewed on April 8^th 2020 by KVLY, a local television station. He, and presumably all other Minnesota doctors, got a seven-page letter from the Minnesota Department of Health that gave guidance on how to classify COVID-19 deaths. The letter said that if a patient died of any other disease, but was believed to have been exposed to COVID-19, the death certificate should say that COVID-19 was the cause of death even though the patient was never tested, or never tested positive, for that disease.

Watch the interview on YouTube (embedded below) or on Archive.org.

Added on April 11th, 2020 at 5:32 pm
Dr. Annie Bukacek, a longtime Montana (USA) physician with over 30 years of experience, discusses how COVID-19 death certificates are being manipulated to exaggerate COVID-19 deaths in the YouTube video embedded below (also available on Archive.org).

Added on April 12th, 2020 at 2:59 pm
In the April 17^th 2020 edition of The Corbett Report titled “Lies, Damned Lies And Coronavirus Statistics” (originally published on YouTube, also available on Archive.org), James Corbett talks about the misleading numbers and statistics related to the COVID-19 ‘pandemic’.

Various policies that are put in place to inflate the number of COVID-19 cases and deaths are discussed. The fact that the COVID-19 tests were flawed and resulted in a high number of false positives (around 50% in China for example) is also discussed.

Added on April 18th, 2020 at 11:10 am
Here’s from Business AM, “Zweeds top-epidemioloog maakt brandhout van ‘lockdowns’: ‘Zelden heeft een onofficiële studie zo veel impact gehad op de globale beleidsvoering’” (April 21^st 2020) translated from Dutch:

“The study at Imperial College wasn’t very good. Never have I seen an unpublished study that has had so much impact on global policy’. Johan Giesecke, a world-renowned Swedish epidemiologist, advises the Swedish government on the coronary crisis. Giesecke is not just anybody. This scientist is now 70 and retired, but was the very first Chief Scientist of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) and also an advisor to the World Health Organization (WHO).

Sweden is an outsider in the international community when it comes to the fight against the coronavirus and took a different and headstrong approach. Schools, cafes, bars and restaurants remained open. Citizens were considered mature enough to respect ‘social distancing’. The results — despite increasing criticism — are certainly no worse than those in countries where there is a complete lockdown. With more than 10 million inhabitants, the country has less than 15,000 confirmed cases and 1,580 deaths for the time being.

‘The study’s starting point was wrong’

Giesecke was interviewed by the British publication The Post. The video (see below) has been watched almost a million times. According to the Swede, the British decision to abandon group immunity was wrong. He notes that that decision was taken after the publication of the study of the Imperial College. That study assumed half a million deaths without measures, a quarter of a million with a smooth lockdown and 20,000 with a total lockdown. Furthermore, the study assumed an unchanged hospital capacity, something that did not occur anywhere. “Here in Sweden we tripled that capacity.”

“That study was published without being peer-reviewed, a professional term for ‘re-read and assessed by fellow scientists’. It was also full of assumptions and too pessimistic,” says the Swede. “Actually, the study is nothing more than an internal memo from the Imperial College. Rarely has an uncontrolled study had so much impact on global policy making. And that for a disputable study, to put it mildly.”

…

According to him, only the elderly and vulnerable should be protected. The weakening of the curve now being measured in various European countries is as much the result of the premature death of the most vulnerable people as the lockdown itself.

…

According to Giesecke, COVID-19 is indeed “a mild disease comparable to the flu”. “People who die today would otherwise have died within a short period of time.”

Added on April 27th, 2020 at 12:02 pm
Dr. Dan Erickson and Dr. Artin Massihi of Bakersfield, CA in the USA dropped multiple bombshells that completely eviscerate the official government narrative during a press conference (available on Archive.org and also on LBRY) published by 23 ABC News | KERO on YouTube on April 22^nd 2020. Main points made by the doctors:
- The answer as to whether or not we need to continue to stay at home and keep businesses closed is an emphatic “NO”.
- COVID-19 is in fact no more dangerous than seasonal flu.
- Quarantining is a health hazard in and of itself.
- ER doctors are being pressured to add COVID-19 to death reports.
- Not about science. Not about COVID-19. When they use the word “safe” — that’s about controlling you.
Added on April 27th, 2020 at 12:08 pm
Here’s from MSN News, “Pa. removes 200 deaths from state coronavirus count as questions mount about reporting process, accuracy” (April 24^th 2020):

Pennsylvania has corrected its coronavirus data multiple times over the past week to account for irregularities, according to new reports.

Earlier this week, Pennsylvania started to include “probable deaths” in its fatalities. As a result, the total number of coronavirus deaths grew by 276, then 360, in successive nights, almost doubling the number of deaths in the state in two days. The Pennsylvania Department of Health (DOH) subsequently removed 200 deaths from its count after facing mounting questions about the accuracy of the count.

Health Secretary Rachel Levine spoke to the Philadelphia Inquirer about the initial decision to include probable deaths, as well as the decision to later remove those from the count.

…

Levine clarified that both spikes in numbers due to “probable deaths” included deaths that occurred days, even weeks earlier.

Added on May 3rd, 2020 at 7:24 pm
Here’s from USA Today, “Fact check: Hospitals get paid more if patients listed as COVID-19, on ventilators” (April 24^th 2020):

Sen. Scott Jensen, R-Minn., a physician in Minnesota, was interviewed by “The Ingraham Angle” host Laura Ingraham on April 8 on Fox News and claimed hospitals get paid more if Medicare patients are listed as having COVID-19 and get three times as much money if they need a ventilator.

…

On April 19, he doubled down on his assertion via video on his Facebook page. Jensen said, “Hospital administrators might well want to see COVID-19 attached to a discharge summary or a death certificate. Why? Because if it’s a straightforward, garden-variety pneumonia that a person is admitted to the hospital for – if they’re Medicare – typically, the diagnosis-related group lump sum payment would be $5,000. But if it’s COVID-19 pneumonia, then it’s $13,000, and if that COVID-19 pneumonia patient ends up on a ventilator, it goes up to $39,000.”

Jensen clarified in the video that he doesn’t think physicians are “gaming the system” so much as other “players,” such as hospital administrators, who he said may pressure physicians to cite all diagnoses, including “probable” COVID-19, on discharge papers or death certificates to get the higher Medicare allocation allowed under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act. Past practice, Jensen said, did not include probabilities.

…

Our ruling: True

We rate the claim that hospitals get paid more if patients are listed as COVID-19 and on ventilators as TRUE.

Hospitals and doctors do get paid more for Medicare patients diagnosed with COVID-19 or if it’s considered presumed they have COVID-19 absent a laboratory-confirmed test, and three times more if the patients are placed on a ventilator to cover the cost of care and loss of business resulting from a shift in focus to treat COVID-19 cases.

This higher allocation of funds has been made possible under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act through a Medicare 20% add-on to its regular payment for COVID-19 patients, as verified by USA TODAY through the American Hospital Association Special Bulletin on the topic.

This gives hospitals an incentive to exaggerate COVID-19 deaths.

Added on May 3rd, 2020 at 7:31 pm
A report on the coronavirus by the German Ministry of the Interior was leaked on May 9^th 2020 by officer Stephan Kohn to the magazine Tichys Einblick, one of the most popular alternative media in Germany. The report titled “Coronakrise 2020 aus Sicht des Schutzes Kritischer Infrastrukturen – Auswertung der bisherigen Bewältigungsstrategie und Handlungsempfehlungen” (“Corona crisis 2020 from the perspective of critical infrastructure protection – Evaluation of the current coping strategy and recommendations for action”) (PDF download) states, among other things, that:
- The danger of COVID-19 has been overestimated.
- People dying of the coronavirus were already at the end of their lives.
- There are some 250,000 coronavirus fatalities worldwide, while 1.5 million deaths occurred during the 2017/18 flu wave.
- Coronavirus poses no greater danger than many other viruses.
- This was a false alarm.
- The government itself turned out to be one of the biggest producers of fake news during the coronavirus crisis.
The report also states that most people die as a result of the coronavirus measures put in place by the government, not because of the virus.

Initially, the government tried to dismiss the report as ‘the work of an employee’. This is not correct, since the document was drawn up by a scientific panel formed by the Ministry of the Interior, which consists of medical experts from various German universities.

The authors released a press statement on May 11^th 2020 in which they criticize the government for ignoring the advice of experts. They also said that their patients suffer greatly from the coronavirus measures.

More on this can be found on Nine for News, “Duitse overheid ernstig in verlegenheid door gelekt rapport: ‘Corona was vals alarm’” (May 30^th 2020).
Added on June 1st, 2020 at 11:52 am
Forcing people to stay at home during the ‘lockdown’ in order to prevent them from getting COVID-19 is not only very dangerous, for a variety of reasons as explained by various medical experts including Dr. Erickson and Dr. Massihi mentioned above, but also ineffective. Here’s evidence from CNBC, “Cuomo says it’s ‘shocking’ most new coronavirus hospitalizations are people who had been staying home” (May 7^th 2020):

Most new Covid-19 hospitalizations in New York state are from people who were staying home and not venturing much outside, a “shocking” finding, Gov. Andrew Cuomo said Wednesday.

The preliminary data was from 100 New York hospitals involving about 1,000 patients, Cuomo said at his daily briefing. It shows that 66% of new admissions were from people who had largely been sheltering at home. The next highest source of admissions was from nursing homes, 18%.

“If you notice, 18% of the people came from nursing homes, less than 1% came from jail or prison, 2% came from the homeless population, 2% from other congregate facilities, but 66% of the people were at home, which is shocking to us,” Cuomo said. “This is a surprise: Overwhelmingly, the people were at home,” he added. “We thought maybe they were taking public transportation, and we’ve taken special precautions on public transportation, but actually no, because these people were literally at home.”

This won’t be so shocking if you listen to the explanations given by Dr. Erickson and Dr. Massihi in the above linked press conference given almost a month earlier. Staying at home doesn’t help, it makes things worse. The draconian measures taken by the criminal governments worldwide are not based on science but on arbitrary decisions that only make things worse.

Added on June 6th, 2020 at 11:24 am
With regard to the “questionable numbers” from Italy mentioned above, here’s more from Rair Foundation, “Italian Leader Slams ‘False Coronavirus Numbers: 25,000 Did Not Die, it’s a way to Impose a Dictatorship’” (May 4^th 2020):

On Friday, April 24, 2020, Vittorio Sgarbi, a member of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, denounced what he claims are false coronavirus death statistics. Sgarbi feels that fake statistics are being propagated by the government and the media to terrorize the citizens of Italy and establish a dictatorship.

The member of the Forza Italia party slammed the closure of 60% of Italian businesses for 25,000 Chinese-Coronavirus deaths from the floor of the legislature. “It’s not true,” he said. “Don’t use the deaths for rhetoric and terrorism.” According to the National Institute of Health, 96.3% did not die of coronavirus, but of other pathologies stated Sgarbi – which means that only 925 have died from the virus and 24,075 have died of other things claimed Sgarbi, “….the virus was little more than an influenza. Don’t lie! Tell the truth!”

Sgarbi’s controversial speech was delivered during ‘Cura Italia’ decree law discussions. The proposal intends to develop measures to strengthen the national health service based on what he claims is false data. Sgarbi challenged his colleagues to investigate the real numbers themselves and be united in the reporting the truth:

Let us be united in liberation against hypocrisy and lies, against falsifications, against the false numbers that are given to terrorize Italians. The 25,000 dead, as Professor Bassetti said, died of heart attacks, cancer and other…Let’s not use them to humiliate Italy. Let’s not use them to give citizens false news. Give the numbers, check them out, and I challenge you before a jury of honor, Trizzino, to look at the numbers…

Elon Musk who mentioned from the very beginning on Twitter that the coronavirus panic was ‘dumb’, agreed with Sgarbi. Here’s from IB Times, “Tesla CEO Elon Musk Believes Coronavirus Death Toll Is Inflated” (May 11^th 2020):

Someone with the twitter handle An0maly posted a video of Sgarbi’s unhinged rant, commenting, “This Italian politician explains what @elonmusk, I & many others are telling the truth about. Even Birx & health officials admit it. The numbers are provably (sic) inflated!!!!! WATCH!”

To which Musk replied, “He is right.”

Musk then sent two tweets to expand on this declaration. The first said, “If someone dies of any condition while having covid, it’s marked as a COVID death. So the death rate is completely wrong.”

The second tweet said, “Absolutely. Moreover, they don’t even need to be tested for covid, just need “covid-like symptoms”, which is a long list, including “feeling weakness”. Hard to die *without* feeling weakness!”

Added on June 6th, 2020 at 7:57 pm
Here’s from “Lockdowns made NO difference to coronavirus but destroyed millions of livelihoods worldwide, JP Morgan study claims” (May 22^nd 2020):

LOCKDOWNS have not altered the course of the coronavirus pandemic but have devastated the global economy, a study by JP Morgan has claimed.

A paper by Marko Kolanovic, a strategist at the investment bank, argued that governments were “spooked” into imposing lockdowns that were “late” or “inefficient”.

…

‘ECONOMIC DEVASTATION’

Kolanovic also expressed concern about the economic fallout from the lockdowns.

“Unlike rigorous testing of new drugs, lockdowns were administered with little consideration that they might not only cause economic devastation but potentially more deaths than Covid-19 itself,” he claimed.

“At the same time, millions of livelihoods were being destroyed.”

Added on June 10th, 2020 at 5:54 pm
Here’s from “Chinese Study Finds Asymptomatic COVID-19 Carriers Might Not Readily Spread the Disease” (May 27th 2020):

An interesting study on COVID-19 published in the journal Respiratory Medicine suggests that asymptomatic carriers might not spread the disease very effectively after all.

The researchers wanted to find out how effective asymptomatic carriers of SARS-CoV-2 might be in spreading the virus, a question of extreme relevance due to its relationship to aggressive lockdown policies that have assumed that asymptomatic carriers would spread the virus far and wide. […]

…

Their conclusion following their observations?

“Based on the foregoing discussion, we conclude that the infectivity of some asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers might be weak. This finding implicates that there is not [a need] to worry unduly for asymptomatic or mild patients during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, excessive virus nucleic acid detection is unnecessary, which can relieve the pressure on public health resources. Under the development of epidemic circumstance, [the public is concerned about] the increasing number of asymptomatic or mild patients hid[den] in the community. However, combined with our results and the defense measures currently completed, we hope such worries are misplaced and we also believe the world will win this battle certainly.”

…

Suggestive evidence has been accruing that for many reasons the mass home-confinement of much of the world’s population has been a disastrously wrong policy. If additional studies provide future additional illumination or confirmation of this one, we will then know conclusively that a key foundational element used to justify the lockdowns was just as wrong as the models that predicted millions of deaths.

Added on June 10th, 2020 at 6:02 pm
Apart from the Germans as mentioned above, people are also coming to the conclusion in Norway that the draconian lockdown measures were not based on science and were not necessary. Here’s from Business AM, “Noorwegen: ‘Lockdown was niet nodig om Covid-19 te temmen’” (May 28th 2020) (translated from Dutch):

Norway: ‘Lockdown was not necessary to tame Covid-19’

According to Camilla Stoltenberg, the Director-General of the Norwegian Institute of Public Health (Folkehelseinstituttet), similar results would have been achieved in her country without a lockdown. She bases that statement on a study by her institution.

…

The study collected data on confirmed cases of coronavirus registered in Norway, the number of hospital admissions, the reproduction rate, etc. At the beginning of March it was feared that one person infected with the virus would infect four others. Only strict lockdown rules could bring that figure down. This hypothesis came from the Imperial College in London and gave forecasts for a number of European countries, including Norway.

Virus never spread as fast as was feared

In their report, the Norwegian Institute of Public Health now comes to a completely different conclusion: the virus never spread as quickly as was feared and was already on its way back when the lockdown was announced.

…

‘Our conclusion now is that we could have achieved a similar effect without lockdown. By staying open and taking a series of precautions to prevent the spread. It’s important that we admit that. Because should the number of infections rise again in winter or should there be a second wave, we have to be honest in our analysis whether such a lockdown has proven to be effective’.

…

According to Stoltenberg, who is herself a doctor and the sister of former Norwegian Prime Minister and current NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg, such draconian measures should only be announced in the future if there is an academic basis for them. And that was missing now, according to Stoltenberg.

I don’t completely agree with her. Even if there is an academic basis for draconian measures, they should never be forced on people because that is a severe violation of their right to life.

Added on June 16th, 2020 at 11:08 am
Here’s another example of how the so called “COVID-deaths” that are being reported cannot be trusted. This is a case from Suriname, and is just one example of a few known cases there. From Sun, “‘Mijn grootvader had geen Covid-19′” (February 4^th 2021), translated from Dutch:

On Tuesday, February 02, 2021, Jules Franklin Sabajo passed away. According to the doctor’s statement, he would have died of Covid-19. However, his family, especially his children and grandchildren, refuse to believe this. According to them, Sabajo was briefly ill before he died. He did not feel well at times, but that was due to old age. After Jules Sabajo died, his daughter called in the police and the doctor to determine death. “The doctor came and stated out of the blue that my grandfather died of Covid. It was also stated that my grandfather had diarrhea, which is also totally not true. All those days my mother took care of my grandfather and he did not have diarrhea at all. Otherwise she would have put on a diaper for him. So that’s already the first lie,” granddaughter Shermaine Wajwakana told SUN.

According to the family, the doctor determined a false cause of death and she will not stop there. “Maybe because we are natives and they have seen the area, they think we are retarded,” she says. One of the deceased’s daughters has visited the doctor for an interview, but he has refused to speak to her. He feels that the family should be quarantined for eleven days. It has also been indicated that the family can only get the corpse of their loved one after eleven days. But the family does not want to stop there. “Do they want to make money this way? Who is going to pay for all the costs?”

…

The body of their loved one has been transported to Wanica Hospital. They have been told that the amount they have to pay there is SRD 5000. And then there is also the burial cost to be added.

…

People take advantage of natives and think we are retarded. You can’t deal with people’s suffering like that. It feels like people are making money over dead bodies without thinking about what they are doing to the relatives.

I’ve seen a few more cases where the media in Suriname were reporting COVID deaths on social media (specifically Starnieuws on Facebook), and family members leaving comments saying that the person did not die of COVID-19, asking why the media is lying about the cause of death.

Added on April 27th, 2021 at 11:18 am

Pingbacks

Medium censors article on COVID-19 Hysteria — Karel Donk (22/03/2020)
Vitamin C effective against COVID-19 — Karel Donk (29/03/2020)
The COVID-19 Deception — Karel Donk (07/04/2020)
Leaked German government report: ‘Coronavirus was false alarm’ — Karel Donk (01/06/2020)
The COVID-19 Deception – Part 2 — Karel Donk (09/06/2020)
De COVID-19 misleiding – Deel 2 — Karel Donk (09/06/2020)
Lockdown Lunacy — Karel Donk (19/06/2020)
Fabrication of COVID-19 cases and deaths in New York — Karel Donk (20/06/2020)
Elon Musk says he won’t take coronavirus vaccine, calls Bill Gates a ‘knucklehead’ — Karel Donk (30/09/2020)
Stop using your Facebook, Google and Apple accounts — Karel Donk (16/10/2020)
Face mask versus muzzle: COVID-19 one big puppet show? — Karel Donk (15/12/2020)
Vaccinated people have more chronic conditions — Karel Donk (27/04/2021)
Confessions of a Medical Heretic — Karel Donk (16/05/2021)

Comments

There are 14 responses. Follow any responses to this post through its comments RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leo March 16th, 2020 at 1:02 am

M sent this to me this morning (march 16 2020)

Hi L.

As most of us are aware there is a high level of corruption in world governments at every level. The medical and pharmaceutical industry were established by those same governments and they are just as corrupt in their practices.

In m opinion, the evidence is overwhelming that the Coronavirus is a pandemic that was planned many years ago. You may find it interesting to know that the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security with the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, a high-level pandemic exercise for a variant of the Coronavirus on October 18, 2019, in NYC.

They ran a simulation exercise in which the pandemic lasted 18 months and resulted in 65 million casualties. (You can’t make this stuff up) The first link below gives a description of the scenario that I’ve described.

http://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/scenario.html

http://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/

In addition, Dean Koontz was the author of a book titled “Edge of Darkness” The Edge of Darkness was published in 1981. It mentions that a man made virus would be created in a lab in Wuhan China. It says the virus would be the perfect weapon.

https://sm.mashable.com/t/mashable_sea/photo/default/dean-koontz-covid-19_dgvr.960.jpg

In 2008 Sylvia Browne released a book titled “End of Days”.

On page 312 there is a indirect reference to the Coronavirus:

“In around 2020 a severe pneumonia-like illness will spread through the globe, attacking the lungs and bronchial tubes and resisting all known treatments.”

“Almost more baffling than the illness itself will be the fact that it will suddenly vanish as quickly as it arrived, attack again ten years later, and then disappear completely.”

https://centerforinquiry.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/coronavirus_prediction_in_book-x675.jpg

More importantly, this gives us clues that indicate that the illness is SIMILAR to pneumonia. Now lets look at the present year of 2020. The Invisible Rainbow by Arthur Furstenburg chronicles the steps in how EVERY pandemic was created by the manipulation of electrical frequencies or the electrification of the earth, and how within 6 months there was a new flu pandemic all over the world after the introduction of new frequency-emitting technology (1918 spanish flu, 1968 hong kong flu, and now the Coronavirus in 2020)

Dr. Thomas Cowan also confirms that the first flu pandemic was because of the electrification of the earth. In addition, Dr. Cowan shows the link between vaccines and emf absorption in the body. Due to the aluminum and other metals that are found in vaccines, people who receive vaccines are much more susceptible to become receptors for absorbing increased electromagnetic fields. This creates a perfect storm for the deterioration of the human body. He summarizes this in a short 10 minute video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zFN5LUaqxOA

Keep in mind that electromagnetic frequencies operate in many devices such as cell phones, bluetooth devices, smart tvs, wi-fi connections, smart meters and all smart technology devices. If you are not familiar with the 5G frequency, it’s recommended that you conduct in depth research on this topic. 5G operates at a level just below the frequencies of x ray devices. This is the newest technology that’s being implemented for the mobile phone networks. This would be a constant barrage of radiation that far exceeds the safety levels of the human body. I’ve seen a video footage of a 5G tower that destroyed the bark and leaves of a tree.

In conclusion, world governments, the medical community and the mainstream media wants everyone to believe that the Coronavirus is real, but in reality it appears that the influx of electromagnetic frequencies and devices are the real culprit. The Coronavirus is probably fake and non existent. I sent a Facebook message to an individual who said they were very careful to wash their hands and take all of the necessary precautions and yet their doctors told them that they were probably a Coronavirus victim. In addition, I read an article about a newborn infant who has Coronavirus symptoms. This is very telling because the immune system is not fully developed in newborn infants. It’s much easier for emf frequencies to harm the body because the body has not built up total immunity in the infant stage. This is part of a bigger strategy on global depopulation as well as many other topics that are too lengthy to mention at the present moment. If you do some research on Agenda 21 or Agenda 2030 the dots will begin to connect straight to the United Nations. Millions of people are aware of this but the mainstream media conceals the truth because they are part of the cover-up.

Kind Regards,

M.

Reply
Ko March 16th, 2020 at 4:26 am

Point 1: There is not such a thing as a virus that can effect others.
Point 2: Any sane human being sees that there is an agenda rolled out over the masses.
Point 3: Just take notice of the Five Biological Laws that dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer found in the early eighties and you know how Biological Conflicts work within psyche, brain and organ in the human being and also in animal nature.

Here is someone that made a translation from German into English of what Helmut Pilhar has to say about it. He is the father of someone that was treated by dr. Hamer back then and withheld from the Medical Maffia. Quit a story.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvKn4OzcTzM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtooN9C94xM

I myself had made quit a lot of poems in Dutch on a platform where I stated the corona hoax from the beginning in januari and was banned there a week ago for that reason. They were not able to frame me like some sort of nutcase in the first place.

Reply
- Ko March 16th, 2020 at 4:40 am
  
  And o yeah, for quit a lot of people FEARPORN can be deadly if diagnosed and treated by the Global Genocide Guild.
  Didn’t take notice of that because I am not interested in it, but someone did send me the FEARPORN of David Icke and I also saw the FEARPORN with a “virologist” on a Dutch channel that is called Blue Tiger Studio and did a lot of “good work” lately on the farmers protests f.e. and the “green” climate hoax etc. But I earlier noticed that they could have a “hidden agenda”…
  By the way shortly after 9/11 I had seen a lot of microbiologists died on an irregular manner, there were lists of them back then.
  
  Reply
Leo March 17th, 2020 at 9:22 am

I am one of these guys that tested ozone breathing some 8 years ago.
I donated the unit to my family. Last week it magically surfaced when i asked for some electric cable.
I started to use it again, my family is reluctant to follow. There is so much fear spread around the use of ozone.
Here is an url pointing to a dutch forum discussing the use of ozone.
https://www.fatsforum.nl/forums/topic/ozone-generator/page/7/0

Reply
Ko March 26th, 2020 at 3:59 pm

I heard from a German “regular medical doctor” ( Dr. med. Claus Köhnlein) that he read in The Lancet a corona patient case from a 50 year old man that was given so much poison (6 different poisons, also AZT like stuff), that he died. He called it murder.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYmQdk4CvQg
I called it a genocide from the beginning.
Also read that the criminals from Terrorstate Israel head their “corona control center” in a protected nuclear shelter…
Corona is the NEW 9/11. Fake Virusses vs Fake Terrorists…
and also GIF/AIDS 2.0, now not a genocide on the African continent with the help of the Medical Maffia, but a genocide on all continents as a reset of their Pervert Paper System.
I had the idea to at least wear a T-shirt with a text like:
corona = a
COLLUSION
virusses = a
DELUSION

Reply
Leo April 4th, 2020 at 12:31 pm

A few days back when i went in town to re-supply i drove past a local hospital. It was eerie to see it was almost abandoned. So here locally no rushing.

Reply
Ko April 5th, 2020 at 4:01 am

Dr. Schiffmann also found out after another md send him a letter that the RKI (Robert Koch Institute) didn’t want to do any autopsies. Which should be usual to see what was the cause of death. No wonder if you see that what was written in the Lancet as treatment.
I guess Schiffmann suggested to do their own autopsies…

Reply
Ko April 5th, 2020 at 6:07 am

Van het Gerhard Wisnewski kanaal zie ik dat apotheken in Duitsland een schrijven kregen om er voor te zorgen voldoende morfine e.d. op voorraad te hebben als middel bij “paliatieve patienten”. Met andere woorden, wat we al eerder zagen een “license to kill”. Ofwel wat ik al eerder zei: volkerenmoord/voorjaarsschoonmaak. Het uit de weg ruimen van nutteloze eters door “palliatieve teams” dus…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LoO_EgDBHsI

VOORJAARSSCHOONMAAK

hoe ruim je die bejaardenhuizen op
met al die ouwe nutteloze eters
nee niet de strop we weten wel wat beters
we zetten op bezoekjes nu een stop

je isoleert zo die antieke bende
dan kwijnen ze vanzelf weg uit ellende

21-3-2020

Reply
Leo April 8th, 2020 at 4:23 am

April 8, 2020 I just checked youtube zFN5LUaqxOA is gone (violation of guidelines).
Also gone is xYmQdk4CvQg same reason violation of guidelines.

Reply
Ko April 27th, 2020 at 2:30 pm

I was watching yesterday YT channel Matthew Belair with his guests Dr. Kelly Brogan, Dr. Andrew Kaufman and Dr. Barre Lando on Covid-19.
Thats beyond the nonsense of test fakery shows etc…

Reply
- Ko April 27th, 2020 at 2:51 pm
  
  And oh I saw that Dan Erickson for a minute and he is totally embedded in the nonsense paradigm of a “contagious” virus…. way to go for that guy… 🙂
  Doesn’t understand Nature/Science for a bit.
  
  Reply
  - Karel Donk April 28th, 2020 at 9:28 am
    
    The full press conference got banned by YouTube yesterday from the official ABC news channel. So Erickson and his colleague were making some obviously good points if they angered the WHO and Gates lackeys.
    
    Reply
    - Ko April 28th, 2020 at 9:49 am
      
      maybe… but what I saw is he has no clue of whats going on…:)
      so I’m not interested in that guy
      and the fact that something is taken down by YT does not say anything to me… just like last the fraud and fearmongering Icke that was “taken down”
      as if that “taken down” is a way to promote BS for the sheeple… 🙂
      
      Wat ik eerder interessant vind is te zien dat meer dan een eeuw geleden al hetzelfde plaatsvond:
      
      De tuberculose-onderzoeker Prof. Dr. Friedrich Franz Friedmann tot Dr. Carl Ludwig Schleich (1858-1922):
      
      Ga, beste Schleich, volgens je hele temperament kun je het niet geloven, de laatste reden voor verzet tegen een nieuwe innovatie in de geneeskunde is altijd dat honderdduizenden mensen leven van het feit dat iets ongeneeslijk is. Alle instellingen, alle beroepen, hele ambachten, hotels, sanatoria zijn afgestemd op het weliswaar betreurenswaardige feit dat tuberculose ongeneeslijk is, want de wet van het economisch egoïsme is sterker dan welk idee van de mensheid dan ook!
      
      Uit het boek van Hanno Beck „Krebs ist heilbar. Dr. med. Ryke Geerd Hamer – Beispiel einer Erkenntnisunterdrückung“
Leo June 1st, 2020 at 11:59 am

En nu gaat het gebeuren :. Bijltjesdag

Reply

Popular Posts

Recent Posts

The Global Coronavirus (COVID-19) Hysteria

What is the mortality rate of the new coronavirus?

Prevents and heals

Healed after two days

Additional Notes

Meta

Pingbacks

Comments

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Recent Posts

Subscribe to blog via Email

Popular Posts

Recent Posts

What is the mortality rate of the new coronavirus?

Prevents and heals

Healed after two days

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Related

Recent Posts

Subscribe to blog via Email