PLEASE NOTE: If you see this text, it means that certain resources could not be loaded and the website is not displayed correctly. This can happen when browsing on Apple devices (iPhone, iPad etc.) due to a bug in their software. Try the refresh button to reload this website, or use a different device not running Apple's iOS. Stop using Apple products.
Type what you’re looking for and press Enter.

The COVID-19 Deception – Part 2

While international awareness is growing that the far-reaching countermeasures taken by criminal governments against the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus have not only proven to be ineffective but have also had disastrous consequences in various areas, the Surinamese criminal government is now in the process of imposing more or less the same countermeasures on the local population.

In a previous article titled “The COVID-19 deception” (April 7th 2020), I had already discussed the fact that misleading mortality rates were published worldwide which made COVID-19 seem much more dangerous than it really is. In fact, in a publication in the International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents titled “SARS-CoV-2: fear versus data” (March 19th 2020), the researchers even stated that a “SARS-CoV-2 infection cannot be described as being statistically more severe than infection with other coronaviruses in common circulation” and that the virus “does not seem to be deadlier than other circulating viruses.”

Since then more and more doctors and other medical specialists and scientists around the world are coming to the same conclusions based on their own data and experience. Two specialists who went viral worldwide in April 2020 are Dr. Dan Erickson and Dr. Artin Massihi, owners of Accelerated Urgent Care — the largest coronavirus test center in Bakersfield, California. At a press conference held on April 22nd 2020, which was shared by Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk on Twitter shortly thereafter, they stated that according to their own collected data and experience, the far-reaching lockdown measures were based on fear and not on scientific research, that those measures are not working, and on the contrary are causing extensive damage to the individual and the economy.

Dr. Dan Erickson (left) and Dr. Artin Massihi

According to them it turns out that “COVID-19 is no more dangerous than the seasonal flu,” and that social-distancing and quarantining people “is in itself a great danger to their health and causes damage to their immune system.” Moreover, they indicated that even people who stay at home can still become infected with the coronavirus in all kinds of other ways, and it no longer made sense to force people to stay at home. They discussed several examples of how this can happen, and I recommend that you take a look at the full press conference yourself (alternative link).

That Dr. Erickson and Dr. Massihi were right was later proven by figures presented by Governor Andrew Cuomo of the State of New York on May 7th 2020. These figures showed that 66% of the new COVID-19 cases admitted to hospitals were people who stayed at home. “66% of people were at home, which is shocking to us,” said Cuomo. “This is a surprise: Overwhelmingly, the people were at home. We thought maybe they were taking public transportation, and we’ve taken special precautions on public transportation, but actually no, because these people were literally at home.” Staying at home doesn’t stop the infection.

The use of gloves and masks outside of an acute medical situation also “makes no sense” according to Dr. Erickson. “We don’t wear masks. Why is that? Because we understand microbiology and immunology and we want strong immune systems.”

Furthermore, the lockdown measures turned out to have all kinds of negative effects on the personal lives of people who are often locked up at home without an income. For example, Dr. Erickson mentioned that in clinics of fellow physicians there was an increase in cases of child abuse, domestic violence, alcohol abuse, depression and suicide (Cafe Weltschmerz gave an example).

Dr. Erickson also confirmed that the number of COVID-19 deaths is artificially inflated. Fellow ER-physicians working at various hospitals are “under pressure to add COVID-19 to death certificates”. “Why is that?” Erickson asked. “Is it because they want to make COVID-19 look worse than it really is? I think so!” Dr. Annie Bukacek, a longtime Montana (USA) physician with over 30 years of experience, discussed during a speech on April 6th 2020 how COVID-19 death certificates are being manipulated to exaggerate COVID-19 deaths. Dr. Scott Jensen, a physician and a Minnesota state senator in the USA, was interviewed on April 8th 2020 by KVLY, a local television station. He, and presumably all other Minnesota doctors, got a seven-page letter from the Minnesota Department of Health that gave guidance on how to classify COVID-19 deaths. The letter said that if a patient died of any other disease, but was believed to have been exposed to COVID-19, the death certificate should say that COVID-19 was the cause of death even though the patient was never tested, or never tested positive, for that disease.

This policy is in line with the policy in other countries such as Italy, of which I gave examples in a previous article. In Italy, on April 24th 2020, Vittorio Sgarbi, a member of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, denounced what he claims are false coronavirus death statistics. Sgarbi feels that fake statistics are being propagated by the criminal government and the media to terrorize the citizens of Italy and establish a dictatorship. “Don’t say there are 25,000 dead. It’s not true,” he said. “Don’t use the deaths for rhetoric and terrorism. The numbers from the Higher Institute of Health say that 96.3% of those people died from other diseases,” Sgarbi said. “The science said that the virus was little more than an influenza. Don’t lie! Look at the numbers! Tell the truth!”

Elon Musk, who said from the beginning on Twitter that the panic surrounding the coronavirus is ‘dumb’ and called the measures ‘fascistic’, agrees with Sgarbi. “He is right,” Musk said. “If someone dies of any condition while having COVID, it’s marked as a COVID death. So the death rate is completely wrong. Moreover, they don’t even need to be tested for COVID, just need ‘COVID-like symptoms’, which is a long list, including ‘feeling weakness’. Hard to die *without* feeling weakness!” he added.

According to Dr. Erickson, the media is also to blame for the fear and panic being sown among the population. Everywhere in the world, including in Suriname, we see that the media coverage mainly emphasizes the number of additional infections and deaths and the obedience to the lockdown measures of criminal governments, while opposing views are not or rarely highlighted and often even actively censored. According to professor Michaéla Schippers, professor of Behavior and Performance Management at Erasmus University Rotterdam, a dangerous mix of prejudice, fear and unwillingness to admit that one is wrong results in the “unethical experiment” in which criminal governments together with large parts of the media have plunged the world at the moment. “The lockdown is pointless; there is no evidence that it works. The media has almost dubiously allowed itself to be used as an extension of government information,” she stated in an interview at Cafe Weltschmerz. In a paper titled “For the Greater Good? The Devastating Ripple Effects of the Covid-19 Crisis” (June 1st 2020) she concludes that “the lockdown measures create a paradoxical situation in which not only sick people are negatively affected, but also healthy people.”

A report on the coronavirus by the German Ministry of the Interior was leaked on May 9th 2020 by officer Stephan Kohn to the magazine Tichys Einblick, one of the most popular alternative media in Germany. The report, on which a dozen or so doctors and professors from various universities in Germany have worked, states that “the State has failed in the coronavirus crisis in an almost grotesque way.” In a press release, the scientists concerned stated that “the observable effects and consequences of COVID-19 do not provide sufficient evidence that it is more than a false alarm in terms of health effects on society as a whole. The new virus has probably never posed a risk to the population in excess of normal levels […]. The people dying from corona are mainly those who are statistically dying this year because they have reached the end of their lives and their weakened bodies are no longer able to withstand random daily exposure (including to the approximately 150 viruses currently in circulation). The danger of COVID-19 has been overestimated. (No more than 250,000 deaths from COVID-19 worldwide within a quarter of a year, compared to 1.5 million deaths during the flu wave in 2017/18). Of course, the risk is no greater than that of many other viruses. In all likelihood, we are dealing with a global false alarm that has gone unnoticed for a long time.

They also didn’t have anything positive to say about the ‘protective’ measures of the German criminal government. “The collateral damage [because of the measures] is now enormous and far greater than any observable benefit. […] Just a comparison of previous deaths due to the virus with deaths due to the protective measures prescribed by the State […] supports this finding. Much of this damage will continue to manifest itself even in the near and distant future. This can no longer be prevented but can only be minimized. […] The shortcomings and failures in crisis management have consequently led to the dissemination of unsubstantiated information, and thus disinformation, to the public. […] The State turned out to be one of the biggest fake-news producers in the coronacrisis.”

Finally, I quote a piece that the Surinamese criminal government and the COVID-19 management team should also take to heart: “The state-ordered protective measures, as well as the various social activities and initiatives, which as original protective measures cause collateral damage, but have now lost all meaning, are for the most part still in effect. It is strongly recommended that they be completely abolished in the short term in order to prevent further damage to the population — in particular unnecessary additional deaths — and to stabilize the situation in the critical infrastructure, which is becoming precarious.

Lawsuits are currently being prepared in several countries against the ‘protective’ measures taken by the local criminal governments. In my previous article I mentioned Germany, and now preparations are also underway in the Netherlands and Belgium; the summons can be found online at In Suriname food technologist Ricky Stutgard also pointed out that the “stricter measures must be legally challenged”. “They are setting up a concentration camp in Suriname. And I’ve called on lawyers to check if the COVID team is not trampling on our human rights,” he said in a message on Facebook that went viral.

I won’t be surprised if it turns out that the number of infections in Suriname with the SARS-CoV-2 virus is already in the thousands — widespread as Dr. Erickson made the comparison with influenza. This may even have been the case from well before the lost elections on May 25th. At the time, it was thought that the number of infections had been reduced to zero, but at the same time no widespread tests had been done. We know from international figures that 95 percent of people infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus are asymptomatic or show only mild symptoms and are not bothered by it. So you don’t notice those people and they don’t sign up for testing. Consequently people had a “false sense of security” as it is called in the Information Security (INFOSEC) sector. In this case, that “false sense of security” is not a big problem because, as several scientists now point out, we are dealing with a “false alarm” of a disease “similar to influenza”. And we haven’t had a panic or lockdown for influenza in decades. Not even when there were a number of deaths registered in Suriname due to the influenza outbreak in 2019.


  1. Psychological warfare used in Germany to make citizens receptive to the hard lockdown — Karel Donk (09/02/2021)


There are 3 responses. Follow any responses to this post through its comments RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.