How indeed did the Twin Towers collapse

May 25th, 2006

Recently a new 9/11 video has been released titled “What’s the Truth: How indeed did the Twin Towers collapse.” You can download it here.

Yet another interesting video to add to the rest of the 9/11 videos already available. This one focuses on the WTC towers and building 7. It has a lot of footage taken from live broadcasts by the mainstream media where you can hear many people talk about hearing, seeing, feeling and even experiencing the explosions going off in the buildings before they collapsed. Very nice material, and I would highly recommend you take a look at the video.

As you may already know, the 9/11 Commission completely ignored the testimonies from firefighters about the explosions, and those were never mentioned in their final report. It’s as if those things never happened, when in fact they did. The 9/11 Commission also ignored the collapse of building 7, which was not hit by an airplane and had no significant damage, and they did not even mention building 7 in their report. Building 7 is an obvious case of controlled demolition.

A preview of a newer release of the ‘9/11 Eyewitness’ video has also been released. You can watch it here. No wait. Let me rephrase that. You should watch it here. In the preview you can see the cutter charges going off while one of the WTC towers is collapsing. Remember that firefighters have repeatedly said that they could see those bright flashes going around the building before they came down.

Comments

There are 12 responses. Follow any responses to this post through its comments RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

S. King May 27th, 2006 at 6:00 pm

I’m afraid you have been taken in by 9/11 conspiracists and not paid any attention to what firemen ACTUALLY said and what structural engineers and physicists know about the collapses.

Do complete research on your own and ASK questions of those who are promoting this false and debunked information.

Reply
Karel Donk May 27th, 2006 at 6:11 pm

I would appreciate it a lot if you could point me towards any other info you may have so I can take a look, if I haven’t already seen it.

Reply
bobn June 2nd, 2006 at 9:18 pm

You certainly have a lot of feedback and responses from your subject postings for a country with a very large population. Quite possibly this lends to the credibility of your statements and the unsubstantiated and inconclusive arguements put forward that elucidate the incomprehensible disrespect and refutation of the innocent lives lost from those attacks. I am not from America, I live in the Southern Hemisphere and these attacks caused me indelible shock. However what is more disturbing are these deplorable claims against a government so determined to ensure the safety and security of its people.

In refuation of one of these claims, is there any possibility that these terrorists were in the United States and have actually planned a BIT more than flying a commercial aircraft into several buildings. Is there a slight chance of the terrorists planting explosives in public access buildings, despite the fact those emperical claims of controlled explosions have minimal plausibility. Is it at all possibly that people with an unjustified determination to end lives of those unlike themselves may have planned a bit more than what you could conceive. I’ll be sure to wait for the reply as I expect you don’t do too much else.

Reply
Karel Donk June 3rd, 2006 at 7:46 am

bobn:

Thanks for taking the time to reply. I agree that the events on 9/11 were shocking. I don’t think you’ll find anyone who didn’t think that.
But why are you so convinced of the US government’s good intentions? You know they lied to invade Iraq, right? They’re lying on a daily basis, even to their own people.

I want to ask you to browse the “September 11” category and the “Politics” category here on my website, and look at the posts in chronological order. Read them, and look at the videos, listen to the audio that I link to. Read the books I mention, and look at the movies I recommend. Have an open mind, and try to be objective about the info and come to your own conclusions.
To get started quickly, you might want to read “The New Pearl Harbor” and “The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions” both by David Ray Griffin.

It’s a lot of work, but I think you’ll find it to have been useful in the end.

Reply
911eyewitness June 29th, 2006 at 2:52 pm

Well, best to hear it from the firemen themselves.

It is nice that people take and interest, it is better when they see there is a problem.

It is sad to see the ones that pontificate from a vacum and don’t take the time to find out.

Here are real firemen:
http://www.911eyewitness.com/samples/southfiremen.php

Enjoy

Reply
bobn July 10th, 2006 at 3:02 am

Pontificate from a vaccum? You lefties are destroying America and are too oblivious to realise the threat you pose by implicating a government with unsubstantiated and defaming evidence. I’m completely convinced that fire officers with no interest or experience in structural engineering, would be able to succinctly describe and provide accurate evidence that supports such claims. Although I am not sure but there could possibly be other mechanisms that could cause a ‘popping’ noise. For example rapid air composition or RAPC, that could be caused by an immediate pressurisation of air in certain sized spaces, maybe a level of a building perhaps.

Show some respect, amiability and dignity for your government who provides basic social services to you, especially on wages that you would earn, who require these services for basic welfare. Maybe the democratization of Iraq by the Coalition forces will enable those innocent people in Iraq to be afforded even the basic human services that they were deprived of under the former regime.

Why dont you read something intellectual, that is something from the right who can actually provide retrospective evidence and justification for the Republican party’s action. The left are driving America and the West down with their refutation of matters that are of concern to humanity and not to promote your own hypocritical and subjective opinions of a government you clearly have very little appreciation of.

P.S ‘9/11 Eyewitness’, there are firewomen, try to affirm women with the same rights and respect as men, and also learn to spell.

Reply
short but sweet July 13th, 2006 at 5:51 am

alright buddy.. why somebody situated in the southern hemisphere would make a statement like “you lefties are destroying america” is beyond me. neither are we destroying america nor are we, as you put it, posing a threat by implicating our government, etc. you should really put down the thesaurus and worry more about presenting a cogent argument than using words that you obviously don’t quite understand so gratuitously.

you must gather that asserting the possilibility that, in fact, it was the terrorists that planted explosives that toppled the towers basically legitimizes the argument of there being explosives in the first place. and although i find most of the conspiracy theories ridiculous and their purporters manipulative, sensationalizing opportunists, there are many facts and uncertainties that point to our government’s collusion and/or purposeful neglect. WT7’s questionable implosion is just one of these. ever heard the term “cui bono”? because there is little doubt that the people now (and then) in power benefitted tremendously from what happened on that day.

it doesn’t take much research to gain a healthy degree of skepticism towards the neo-cons (new brand of republicans, essentially) and the like. i couldn’t even begin to list the damning things that these groups have been caught doing and saying. if you want to understand the elements at play here, the depth of what amounts to their betrayal of the american people, you needn’t pay attention to the conspiracy theorists – these individuals do a disservice to the incredibly small number of people who are truly daring journalists, friends of the people. GREG PALAST, AMY GOODMAN, and EDUARDO GALEANO, for example, are reputable voices of reason and have done everything in their power to pull the wool from the eyes of the american populus and the world. they will tell you much of what you need to know, whether regarding genocides that were deliberately ignored in the western world (ie Timor 70s and 80s), the true motives behind neo-con foreign policies (ie coups and militia support throughout latin america in 80s and 90s), or how the media has been in the pocket of the government and corporations not just in the last 20 years, but since the country was founded.

put simply, there is an ulterior motive for everything our present leadership does, while it may not have been very different in the past. and sadly, those that we could hope to replace them with have a certain interest in retaining the status quo, as well; although, limited options taken into account, the difference between the parties is extremely wide at the current time.

so you really think that our government is so benevolent? you refer to our social services… by comparison with the rest of the developed world, our educational system is shit, the level of pollution emitted and the regulations governing it are horrible, the number of people with adequate health insurance is very low with health costs that are out of control, we have the 2nd worst newborn mortality rate (of course affecting minorties way more than whites) only in front of latvia, the national level of savings is close to nil while the amount of debt is enormous, and 2 FUCKING MILLION people of our not even 300 million citizens reside in jail (blacks are 10 times more likely to be in prison than whites). needless to say, not all of this is a failure of government, but please grasp this fact.. DEMOCRACY AND CAPITALISM COEXIST UNCOMFORTABLY.

this doesn’t even speak to the recent patriot act and the new examples of governement agencies infringing upon our civil rights, with foreign nationals and citizens alike being detained without charge indefinitely, etc…. look, i digress, but read this:

“Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event ? like a new Pearl Harbor.”

look it up. this statement is taken from a report from september 2000 (2 months before bush stole the election and a year before 9/11) presented by a group of powerful men who believe we should use american might and leadership more liberally around the world to various ends. this group is called the project for a new american century and includes the likes of paul wolfowitz, donald rumsfeld, james woolsey, elliott abrams, richard armitage, bill kristol, richard perle, and others who are and have been integrally involved in the political and military arenas for many years. and you wonder why we look our gift horse government in the mouth?

like a new fucking pearl harbor.

Reply
Brad September 9th, 2006 at 10:30 pm

There are many, many important and unanswered questions associated with 911, from why the NTSB (which has investigated EVERY other airplane crash in the US since its formation) was not allowed to investigate ANY of the 911 crashes, to who benefited from the unprecedented volume of \’put\’ calls in the week before 911 on United and American Airlines and one of the major insurers of the WTC, to what became of the HUNDREDS of billions of dollars in gold bullion stored at the WTC. (less than one billion has been recovered) to why certain people in the government had already cancelled flights for themselves on 911, hours before anything had happened. I have never trusted HW Bush annd his son; both seemed to say things people wanted to hear while their eyes showed contempt for how easily they could dupe the public. The only people to profit from them being in office are oil and drug companies; and other big business when EPA clear air standards were gutted. After 911 that includes military contractors as well. WHEN WILL SOMEONE WITH POWER AND INFLUENCE STAND UP AND SHOUT \”ENOUGH!\” We need to spread the message about the widepspread lying the Bush administrations have done, to that end check out bushlies.com. Doesnt it seem just a LITTLE repressive that the knowledgeable people who have questioned why the towers collapsed, like Kevin Ryan at Underwriter Labs, and Professor of Physics Steven E Jones have lost their jobs ( Professor Jones is just on leave for now as of late this week, but I bet he doesn\’t survive at BYU one more term) It is time for a whole hearted regime change here in America; but the American people seem unwilling (in general) to wake up and smell the horse#$(*.

Reply
odd January 30th, 2007 at 12:57 am

I do find it odd that all of what has been said, like he said she said, just could have been a way to get insurance because I still don’t see why people who have power and money namely the president or whoever ,would need more. I mean we are talking about the most powerful person in the world are we not? But aside from all the conspircy wasn’t Clinton in power in the first bombing of the WTC? I can hear it now, surely it wasn’t Clinton that had anything to do with the 9/11 attack. And you’re right thus my point does become clear. It was an insurance frad……… naaa, that couldn’t have been it. No way……… didn’t the towers just change hands??

We were under attack and they set the towers off so that they wouldn’t fall out over all or most of the city. Sounds pretty ligit to me, but again what do I know I’ll leave that to the left wingers out there. And since I’m neither left or right I leave it to those who think they know everyting about eveything……… just remember we get a NEW president here very soon and then we can all talk new tales about them like there was about Clinton taking over the country, etc, etc… yawn! I’m bored. Seems to me if you want more power you work out of peace not war. You become a friend and become loved so that you get your way not by losing respect. but that’s just me I guess. So tell us again why those in power would dream this up? Is the president that smart I mean we are talking about the same man are we not? Come on now……. Don’t get me wrong I voted for the man but to say he had this in him while he was running for president really is beyound me. Oh that’s right he stole the race, I forgot. Man he is a genius. WOW!! (we are talking about the same man are we not? the smartest president to have ever lived..LOL….)

Bring our guys and gals home……..

Reply
jane doe May 30th, 2007 at 9:05 am

the twin towers fell because the metal bars metted and the turn like lickrish and caved into every floor untill it was all gone

Reply
Realist June 30th, 2007 at 3:12 pm

Jane Doe, the “steel melting” nonsense has been disowned by even the NIST apologists. I know it’s hard to keep up with the government’s ever-changing story but please try. By the way, have you actually watched the video footage of the “collapses”? If so, how do you explain away the squibs (puffs shooting out of windows) many many storeys below the “collapsing” area? How do you explain steel beams weighing tons being thrown like matchsticks several hundred feet away mostly horizontally? How do you explain the massive clouds of concrete dust? What pulverized it? It would require many times the energy from a gravity-driven collapse to convert solid concrete to dust. How do you explain the explosions that have been mentioned by many firefighters and EMS personnel who survived? How do you explain the freefall-rate “collapses” of both Towers and WTC # 7 when it defies even common sense that it could occur at freefall rate without explosives (since the uppermost floors fell into and THROUGH the remainder of the building as quickly and effortlessly as falling through air? What besides explosives would reduce the remainder to such a state of offering no more resistance than air?? Hello!!!). Have you watched the footage of WTC # 7 “collapsing”? If so, how do you explain the two parallel rows of squibs proceeding up the face of the building just before and as it’s “collapsing”, looking like a textbook controlled demolition? Any ideas? If so, send them to NIST because they admit that their “most likely hypothesis” isn’t even remotely possible.

Reply
Coil Coyle November 9th, 2008 at 12:29 pm

Don’t give up Karel. I’m a 58 year old welder/technician who has realized that the truth must include thermite in WTC7.
Thanks for giving a hoot about Our Country.

With the new President we need to all develop a pressure campaign to get an independent prosecutor with subpoena power and an anulment of all of the victims contracts to stay quiet for their payments.

If you have any ideas for a campaign, include my email too.

Gratefully,
Coil

Reply

Popular Posts

Recent Posts

How indeed did the Twin Towers collapse

Meta

Comments

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Recent Posts

Subscribe to blog via Email

Popular Posts

Recent Posts

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Related

Recent Posts

Subscribe to blog via Email