Here’s another clear example of female sexual suppression in society: A sex scene featuring actress Evan Rachel Wood was cut out of the movie “Charlie Countryman” by the MPAA because apparently it showed oral sex being performed on Wood’s character while she was enjoying herself. Here’s what Wood had to say about this in a series of posts on Twitter:
After seeing the new cut of #CharlieCountryman I would like 2 share my disappointment with the MPAA, who thought it was necessary to censor a woman’s sexuality once again. The scene where the two main characters make ‘love’ was altered because someone felt that seeing a man give a woman oral sex made people ‘uncomfortable’ but the scenes in which people are murdered by having their heads blown off remained intact and unaltered.
This is a symptom of a society that wants to shame women and put them down for enjoying sex, especially when (gasp) the man isn’t getting off as well! It’s hard for me to believe that had the roles been reversed it still would have been cut. OR had the female character been raped it would have been cut. It’s time for people to GROW UP.
Accept that woman are sexual beings … Accept that some men like pleasuring women. Accept that women don’t have to just be fucked and say thank you. We are allowed and entitled to enjoy ourselves. It’s time we put our foot down …
Wood is correct in stating that this is “a symptom of a society that wants to shame women and put them down for enjoying sex.” In fact, more accurately, it’s a symptom of a society that wants to enforce (female) sexual suppression and repression on everyone.
Today everyone living in the modern world is familiar with the Apple logo. It’s one of the most popular and recognizable brands, not to mention the world’s most valued brand since 2013, having overtaken Coca-Cola and even Google who are now in the third and second place respectively, according to a study of the Top 100 brands by Interbrand:
“Every so often, a company changes our lives — not just with its products, but with its ethos,” Jez Frampton, chief executive officer at New York-based brand consultancy Interbrand, said in a statement. Current Apple CEO “Tim Cook has assembled a solid leadership team and has kept Steve Jobs’ vision intact — a vision that has allowed Apple to deliver on its promise of innovation time and time again.”
The fact that Apple has changed our lives is not an overstatement. Apple was one of the key players in the beginning when the personal computing revolution took off, bringing the power of the computer to the masses, and has been and has remained a leader when it comes to innovations in this area. This much is very obvious to almost everybody.
However, not a lot of people realize today that there’s a lot more going on in the background than is immediately obvious on the surface. It appears that Apple is just another milestone in a grander plan spanning thousands of years designed to help humankind to reach a new era of enlightenment. Depending on your level of awareness, this may sound crazy at first, but bear with me for the remainder of this article and you might be surprised. We’ve been given a rare opportunity to take a glimpse behind the scenes as the grand plan unfolds.
New York based photographer Wyatt Gallery visited Suriname for a few days to photograph some historic sites for his project “Jewish Treasures of the Caribbean.” Wyatt has done work for the New York Times in the past and his work has been published in numerous books and magazines such as Esquire and the New York Times, in addition to receiving numerous awards. This was Wyatt’s second visit to Suriname; he had been in Suriname before for the New York Times.
I attended a presentation he did for a group of local photographers yesterday, and was amazed by the work he’s doing. And it’s not just the great photography, but also the way in which he has been able to combine his photography with helping people out in various countries and raising money and awareness for good causes.
In my first note to Barack Obama I had already told him to go fuck himself in connection with his remarks on the Palestinian conflict. Recently he apparently also remarked that he’s “very good at killing people” while discussing the use of drones in counter-terrorist operations in a closed conference with his aides:
Two major military-related groups, Officers of Russia and Soldiers’ Mothers, have addressed the Nobel Committee with a request to evaluate the inhumane statements made by the US president about drone warfare.
“I would like to bring to your attention that [we] were surprised and outraged by the statement made by the Nobel Prize laureate and US President Barack Obama quoted in the book ‘Double Down’ by Mark Halperin and John Heilemann,” the head of the Officers of Russia NGO, Anton Tsvetkov, wrote in the letter to the committee, Infox.ru quoted.
“While discussing the use of drones in counter-terrorist operations in a closed conference with his aides, Barack Obama cynically noted he was ‘very good at killing people.’ In connection with this we ask you to give an official legal and moral assessment of Barack Obama’s words concerning their compatibility with the high title of the Nobel Peace Prize laureate,” he added.
Tsvetkov told reporters at a press conference in Moscow that military professionals in his organization were strongly against the use of drone aircraft in combat as this weapon often causes casualties among civilians. He claims the Officers of Russia possess information proving that Obama personally sanctioned the combat use of drones during missions in Pakistan, Yemen, Afghanistan, Somalia and other countries.
“As a mother and a Human Rights advocate, I cannot understand his drive. I cannot understand the statement by the president of a nation that he can kill people. Obama must either apologize before everybody for his statement or give the [Peace] prize back and admit that he has not yet grown up to bear this high title,” she noted.
In case you’re not aware of what kind of devastation Obama is causing in the lives of innocent people in countries in the middle east using his drones, then I highly recommend you check out the documentary “UNMANNED: America’s Drone Wars.”
When you watch this documentary and see how the lives of innocent families are being ruined, how people are being traumatized, how adults and children are being murdered, how healthy young men and women are left badly injured and disabled for life after a drone strike, then compare that to the above picture of Obama comfortably sitting on a couch spending quality time with his daughters and take the time to fully comprehend the contrast between these situations. All of the atrocities you will see in that documentary are caused by that criminal who somehow received the Nobel Peace Prize, and who apparently also proudly likes to point out that he’s “good at killing people.”
I seem to be joking but what’s going on in the world today does not make me laugh at all. It doesn’t make me laugh because without any doubt, the leaders of our Western countries are taking the people for imbeciles with the help and support of the media which are nothing more today than an organ of propaganda of the ruling powers.
Flaunting and exposing this regime is a duty and makes me proud. And honestly, I apologize for my low class speech, but I fuck you all, the so called do gooders, both left and right wingers and from the center who are today licking the boots of our corrupted powers and who will be pleased to ridicule me. I fuck you all, leaders who are playing with your bombs as kids do in a playground! I fuck you, you who pretend to be democrats, while you are nothing more than low class criminals.
Barack Obama is indeed nothing more than a low class criminal playing with his drones like kids do in a playground. He’s a terrorist. And it’s not only Obama but all of the corporate and banking scumbags behind him who are making huge profits off of the suffering of millions of people around the world. Like Bush, Obama is just another puppet carrying out the dirty work for the elite who are in control, as I wrote about from the very beginning shortly after Obama got elected in 2008:
Do you think George Bush was really taking the decisions for the last 8 years? If you think so, you have a lot of research ahead of you. George Bush has been nothing more than a puppet. The real decisions are being made by powerful people who remain in the background, to forward their own agenda. An agenda that is in their own interests, not yours. Some call them the hidden government or the secret government, the illuminati, some call them the military industrial complex, and many other names, but they’re the same people behind Bush, the same people behind the attacks on 9/11 and the same people behind the Kennedy assassination.
Now Obama is their new puppet, and he’ll be continuing everything Bush has been doing. Don’t mind what he has been saying during his campaign. Talk is cheap. To win the election, it’s neccessary to give people hope and to tell them what they want to hear. His actual actions in the coming years are going to show you where he really stands. Obama wouldn’t even be a candidate and have so much support from corporations and especially the corporate media if they didn’t know beforehand that he would be protecting and supporting their interests, just like Bush has been doing the last 8 years. Interests of a small but powerful group of people. Remember, today the mere fact that a person is allowed to be running for president in the USA and has the approval of the corporate media and widely backed by corporations, means that he’s one of them. This has been the giveaway of the whole plot but few noticed.
It’s almost too crazy to believe that all of the above is going on and that this is actually allowed to go on by the majority of the global population. Not a single day in my life goes by where I don’t wonder in what kind of a fucking hell-hole I’m living in; surrounded by savages in a world ruled by savages.
It seems that Bill Gates doesn’t fully understand what our basic needs are as human beings. As I wrote in my post on the subject, the ability to connect and communicate with one another is one of the most important of our natural needs. Gates apparently just can’t bring himself to realize what kind of impact connectivity to the Internet will have on the improvement of people’s lives. From here:
Gates described initiatives by Facebook and Google to position online connectivity as a humanitarian concern as ‘a joke’
While Gates, 58, said technology is ‘amazing’, he doesn’t believe it is on the ‘first five rungs’ of basic human needs.
‘I certainly love the IT thing,’ Gates told The Financial Times. ‘But when we want to improve lives, you’ve got to deal with more basic things like child survival, child nutrition.’
‘PCs are not, in the hierarchy of human needs, in the first five rungs,’ he added.
Gates’ comments come just a few months after Facebook co-founder Mark Zuckerberg announced that Facebook wants to get more of the world’s more than seven billion people online through a partnership with some of the world’s largest mobile technology companies.
Known as Internet.org, the initiative was launched in August and also includes South Korean electronics giant Samsung, Finnish handset maker Nokia and wireless chip maker Qualcomm.
Today, November 5th 2013, millions of people worldwide will march in the streets of their cities to promote ideas for a new and better world. A world where the freedom of every single individual is truly respected. A world where honesty and the truth are valued. A world where knowledge is free to flow without restrictions, empowering every single human being on this planet, and enabling them to reach their highest potentials.
Even if you are not among those of us marching in the streets today, think long and hard about the world you want to leave behind for your children. Our civil liberties are constantly being threatened; we cannot afford to continue to stand by and watch it happen any longer. The system we live in is fundamentally corrupted. The system is against us. The system enslaves us.
Let us remind this world what it has forgotten; that fairness, justice and freedom are more than just words. A new and higher awareness and collective consciousness is developing on this planet. Nothing can remain hidden.
Knowledge is FREE.
The Corrupt Fear Us.
The Honest Support Us.
The Heroic Join Us.
We Are Anonymous.
We Are Legion.
We Do Not Forgive.
We Do Not Forget.
So there’s this girl that I got to know a while ago. I started talking to her online, found out she had a very nice personality, and it got to a point where I wanted to meet her to see what she’s really like in person. One day I invited her to come along on one of my personal photowalks so that we could meet in person, walk around and chat a bit. She agreed and we decided that we’d do it the following week on a Wednesday in the afternoon at 5 ‘o clock. However at that time we were in the rainy season, so in the days leading up to our meeting the weather was very bad. It literally rained all day long every day. And I can remember her being concerned about the weather, and mentioning that we’d probably not be able to meet. My reply to her each time was not to worry, and that if we were destined to meet on that day, it would happen and the weather would clear up for us. Of course she laughed at me and thought I was being silly. So I told her to just wait and see. And lo and behold, that Wednesday afternoon as the time for our meeting approached, it suddenly stopped raining. Now, just like her, you may initially think that I got lucky, but there’s more.
Mark Zuckerberg’s — or Fuckerberg, as I like to refer to him in such instances — war against female nipples on Facebook just got even more hypocritical. From the Guardian:
So now we know. In Facebook’s world, a beheading is OK but an exposed nipple is not. The social media behemoth has decided that a 13-year-old – for that is the permitted minimum age of a Facebook user – can watch a video of a decapitation, but must be protected from the potentially scarring effects of seeing a breastfeeding mother and child briefly pause for breath.
How else to read its latest decision to lift restrictions in place since May and allow users once again to post head-chopping videos, even as it maintains its ban on images of the most mild form of naturally occurring nudity? (“Photos that show a fully exposed breast where the child is not actively engaged in nursing do violate the Facebook terms” is how the site puts it.)
Really, what the fuck is it with Fuckerberg and female nipples? And why is Fuckerberg allowed to get away with such blatant hypocrisy for so long? It’s not just pictures of breast feeding women that get banned on Facebook, but even cartoons and artistic nude photo’s featuring female nipples. Obviously male nipples are perfectly OK seeing as how Fuckerberg’s own nipples were allowed to be shared on Facebook.
I saw an interesting article on Business Insider today about a proposal that is being considered in Switzerland to implement an unconditional basic income for everyone living there:
Recently, there has been a spate of popular initiatives designed to curb inequality in the country. Earlier this year Swiss voters agreed to an idea proposed by entrepreneur Thomas Minder that limited executive (in his words, “fat cat”) salaries of companies listed on the Swiss stock market. Next month voters will decide on the 1:12 Initiative, which aims to limit the salaries of CEOs to 12 times the salary of their company’s lowest paid employee.
There’s a crazier proposal than this, however. Earlier this month an initiative aimed at giving every Swiss adult a ”basic income” that would “ensure a dignified existence and participation in the public life of the whole population” gained enough support to qualify for a referendum. The amount suggested is 2,500 francs ($2,800) a month.
While most observers think that the vote is a longshot, it has certainly sparked debate — and not just in Switzerland. Writing for USA Today, Duncan Black said that a “minimum income” should be considered for the U.S.
“It’s pretty clear that the most efficient way to improve the lives of people is to guarantee a minimum income,” Black concludes.
I often wonder why it is that after all these years, we haven’t managed to figure out how to structure our societies in such a way where every human being on this planet could at the very least have access to the basic human needs for his entire life. Just recently I blogged about why the poor get poorer and the rich continue to get richer, and it’s very clear that this is because of the way the economic system is set up so that a constantly smaller elite benefits from what is essentially the enslavement of the rest of the population. We’ve reached a point now where this abhorrent situation of inequality is not going to be tolerated much longer, and the kinds of developments discussed in the above mentioned article clearly show this.
I was standing at the waterfront in Paramaribo at dusk about to take this picture, when a homeless guy walked up to me to ask me for some money. He stood next to me while I continued to look at the sky and waited for the light to get more interesting. At the same time I listened to him while he explained that he was really hungry, hadn’t eaten for a while and would really love to buy himself a good meal. He then proceeded to describe in great detail what kind of food he would buy and how he had been longing for a while now to be able to enjoy the taste of such a meal again. I’m used to homeless people asking me for some spare change, but the kind of food this guy wanted to buy would easily cost at least 20 times more compared to what they usually ask for. I got curious and started asking him questions about his background and family, trying to find out how he got into the situation he’s in right now.
After a short conversation during which he answered my questions I put down my camera, reached for my wallet, took out some money and gave it to him. I gave him enough to be able to buy at least two of the meals he described to me. He looked at the money in his hands, looked at me, and then as he clearly started to feel a little emotional and couldn’t look me in the eyes anymore, looked away over the river. Since I’m not very good at handling emotional situations, I looked away over the river too and took another couple of snaps. After a minute or so when his emotions subsided a little he looked at me again and expressed his gratitude with a trembling voice. I gave him a smile and nodded, but started to feel really sad on the inside.
I was already picked up so I told him I had to leave, said goodbye and walked towards the car that was parked further away in the distance. Half way to the car I heard him calling me from behind, so I stopped and turned around. He walked up to me and said, “My brother, be very careful ok? Don’t let anyone ever do you any harm. Ok?” I think I must have looked surprised at first, wondering why he felt the need to tell me that (*), but then I smiled and nodded and continued walking towards the car. I felt more depressed than usual, felt guilty in a way, and started wondering again, as I often do, why I had to live in such a cruel world. I got inside the car and the driver looked at me and asked where I wanted to go. I sighed deeply and answered, “Take me home.”
(*) Days later my dad would tell me about a dream my mom had, where she saw me wading through a very dirty place in thick mud, and told me I should probably be careful. Coincidence? Perhaps. Certainly interesting seeing as how there was a single bird flying high up against the dramatic and stormy looking sky in the above picture.