PLEASE NOTE: If you see this text, it means that certain resources could not be loaded and the website is not displayed correctly. This can happen when browsing on Apple devices (iPhone, iPad etc.) due to a bug in their software. Try the refresh button to reload this website, or use a different device not running Apple's iOS. Stop using Apple products.
Type what you’re looking for and press Enter.

Barack Obama: More of the same

Barack Obama, The New Bush. Sich Heil.

Barack Obama, The New Bush. Sieg Heil.

Looks like it’s official now, Barack Obama is going to be the next President Bush. I watched some of the election coverage, and it’s simply amazing how many people still don’t seem to get it, thinking Obama is going to be bringing any kind of positive change for them.  It’s amazing how many people still don’t realize that today, it doesn’t matter which ones of the candidates win in the USA, because both parties are controlled by the exact same people in the background.

Do you think George Bush was really taking the decisions for the last 8 years? If you think so, you have a lot of research ahead of you. George Bush has been nothing more than a puppet. The real decisions are being made by powerful people who remain in the background, to forward their own agenda. An agenda that is in their own interests, not yours. Some call them the hidden government or the secret government, the illuminati, some call them the military industrial complex, and many other names, but they’re the same people behind Bush, the same people behind the attacks on 9/11 and the same people behind the Kennedy assassination.

Now Obama is their new puppet, and he’ll be continuing everything Bush has been doing. Don’t mind what he has been saying during his campaign. Talk is cheap. To win the election, it’s necessary to give people hope and to tell them what they want to hear. His actual actions in the coming years are going to show you where he really stands. Obama wouldn’t even be a candidate and have so much support from corporations and especially the corporate media if they didn’t know beforehand that he would be protecting and supporting their interests, just like Bush has been doing the last 8 years. Interests of a small but powerful group of people. Remember, today the mere fact that a person is allowed to be running for president in the USA and has the approval of the corporate media and widely backed by corporations, means that he’s one of them. This has been the giveaway of the whole plot but few noticed.

Keep in mind that one of Obama’s advisors is Zbigniew Brzezinski. If you don’t know who Zbigniew Brzezinski is, Google him and prepare to be terrified of what you find. In his book “The Grand Chessboard”, he stated what the Neocons who were behind the Bush regime said in their PNAC document well in advance: “We need a Pearl Harbour event to unify the people behind the war for global Imperial conquest.” Take note of the fact that Brzezinski said this in 1997, about 3 years before the Neocons came up with their PNAC document. As we know, that new Pearl Harbour came on 9/11 and was an inside job, likely planned and executed by those same people backing the Neocons, if not the Neocons themselves. Now, those same people are advising and backing Obama. Also note that Brzezinski together with David Rockefeller founded the Trilateral Commission which was behind the Bush administration.

Here’s more for you:

Obama will be controlled by Zbigniew Brzezinski and the Trilateralists, in other words Obama will be controlled by David Rockefeller and the Council on Foreign Relations. More policies directed by the World Bank, a Trilateral project, as the last six out of seven World Bank presidents have been pulled from the Trilateral Commission, including the neocon Paul Wolfowitz. Actually, when it comes to globalism and imposing a slave and control grid on the whole world, there is little difference between neocons and neolibs. Neocons are obsessed with killing Arabs and Muslims, whereas the neolibs prefer to work behind the scenes with their color revolutions.

Trilats also control the Federal Reserve. Arthur Burns, Paul Volker, and Alan Greenspan all hailed from the Trilateral Commission, although the current chairman, Ben Bernanke, does not. Of course, it does not matter, as the chairman takes his marching orders from the Rockefeller clan.

As should be expected, there is a bit of crossover in the support for Obama. For instance, Joseph Nye, vice chairman of the Trilateral Commission, supports Obama. Nye is also a Bilderberger and a member of the CFR. Nye, along with Robert Keohane, developed theories on neoliberalism, theories now in play starving and immiserating millions around the world.

In fact, Obama has gathered under his tent — that is to say, the tent erected for him — a regular melange of globalists and one-worlders. “The Obama campaign has thus far been shown to represent: the Ford Foundation, the Trilateral Commission, the New York Council on Foreign Relations, the Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderberger Group, Skull and Bones, the RAND Corporation, the Soros foundations, the Rockefeller family, and the Friedmanite Chicago School of economic genocide,” writes Webster Tarpley. “Obama is the Manchurian candidate groomed and indoctrinated by these financier-controlled groupings. As president, Obama would impose a regime of crushing economic austerity and a new set of foreign wars far worse than what has been seen under Bush.”

In other words, more of the same, but according to Tarpley worse. And that’s why it is disgusting to see corporate media whores such as Tim Russert and Keith Olbermann declare Obama the de facto winner. Russert and Olbermann are onboard with the Trilateral Commission, CFR, Skull & Bones, the Bilderbergs, the Rockefeller eugenicists, the Ford Foundation, and their perpetual war, depopulation, and climate change agenda.

But then, if they were otherwise, you wouldn’t see them on television.

Pay special attention to what Webster Tarpley says about Obama. He knows what he is talking about. Also read this interview with Tarpley about Obama.

Did you also know that Obama and Hillary attended this year’s Bilderberg meeting together? If you don’t know what the Bilderberg group is, Google them. You’ll find out that they are a secret group of powerful people around the world who meet with eachother each year in secret, behind closed doors, to discuss the real agenda they have for the world. The agenda you don’t hear about, but see implemented around you every day. Why would Obama meet with them? Not only that, why would someone from the Bilderberg group be selecting Obama’s running mate?

It has been announced that Bilderberg luminary and top corporate elitist James A. Johnson will select Democratic candidate Barack Obama’s running mate for the 2008 election and in turn potentially act as kingmaker for America’s future President.

Johnson also selected John Kerry’s running mate John Edwards in 2004 after Edwards had impressed Bilderberg elitists Henry Kissinger and David Rockefeller with a speech he gave at the globalist confab in Italy that year.

The news further puts to rest any delusions that Bilderberg is a mere talking shop where no decisions are made. In reality, the group is shaping some of the primary developments in the domestic and geopolitical arena today, particularly in the context of oil prices which continue to accelerate towards Bilderberg’s target of $200 dollars a barrel.

It also ridicules once again any notion that an Obama presidency would bring “change” to the status quo of America being ruled by an unelected corporate and military-industrial complex elite.

Pay special attention to the last part of the quote. Is it beginning to make sense now?

But there’s more, my dear reader.

Why are these people also suggesting, way in advance, that Obama will be facing foreign policy problems? Do they know something we don’t know? Have they got something planned for us that we don’t know about? Like they had 9/11 planned up to at least a year before it happened? Check this out:

Trilateral Commission co-founder and top Obama advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski told CNN yesterday that Barack Obama would be faced with “imminent problems” in the context of foreign policy once he takes office, echoing prophetic warnings made recently by Joe Biden, Colin Powell and Madeleine Albright.

Brzezinski’s warning that Obama will face immediate problems in the form of a foreign policy crisis echoes similar sentiments expressed by Obama’s running mate, Senator Joe Biden, who last month told an audience in Seattle “We’re gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy.”

Biden was vehement in his proclamation, stating that it was a “guarantee” and a “promise” that Obama would face an international crisis and that “tough” and “unpopular” decisions would have to be made to combat it.

Colin Powell made similar statements when he endorsed Obama on Meet the Press, saying “There’s going to be a crisis which will come along on the 21st, 22nd of January that we don’t even know about right now.”

Former Secretary of State Madeline Albright also told CNN’s John Roberts, “It’s just a statement of fact…something unexpected, you always have to be prepared for that.”

So the same guy, who said “America needed a new Pearl Harbor event to unify the people behind the war for global Imperial conquest” (and which came on 9/11) is now saying that Obama is going to be facing imminent foreign policy problems. Joe Biden, Obama’s running mate, who was chosen by the Bilderberg Group’s James A. Johnson, seems to be absolutely certain that this crisis will happen, saying it’s “a guarantee and promise” and that it will be a generated crisis. How can he be so sure?? And then Colin Powell even mentions the specific dates! How can Powell mention specific dates, and then go on to say “that we don’t even know about”?? It seems to me that if you can mention specific dates, you sure know about the crisis! And Madeline Albright further assures you of it by saying it’s a statement of fact. How on earth can these people know about a crisis and be so sure about it and specific? Please also remember that Madeline Albright said that 567.000 children dying in Iraq because of US sanctions was worth it:

Lesley Stahl on U.S. sanctions against Iraq: “We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that’s more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?”

Secretary of State Madeleine Albright: “I think this is a very hard choice, but the price–we think the price is worth it.”

–60 Minutes (5/12/96)

Then-Secretary of State Madeleine Albright’s quote, calmly asserting that U.S. policy objectives were worth the sacrifice of half a million Arab children, has been much quoted in the Arabic press. It’s also been cited in the United States in alternative commentary on the September 11 attacks (e.g., Alexander Cockburn, New York Press, 9/26/01).

Here’s more:

Joe Biden’s “guarantee” that an “international crisis” will unfold shortly after President Obama takes office conjures up several different possibilities, but it seems the likely outcome will revolve around an announcement that Iran has developed a nuclear bomb, prompting a potential military attack.

“It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy,” Biden told an audience in Seattle this past weekend.

“Remember I said it standing here if you don’t remember anything else I said. Watch, we’re gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy.”

The assured tone with which Biden delivered his forecast was staggeringly convincing, and left the observer in no doubt that there will be a major world crisis shortly after Obama takes office. “Mark my words, mark my words,” Biden stressed, adding that “tough” and “unpopular” foreign policy decisions will have to be made.

“I promise you it will occur,” Biden added, “As a student of history and having served with seven presidents, I guarantee you it is going to happen.”

Biden’s use of the word “generated” is even more startling. One of the dictionary definitions we find for the word “generated” is “to bring into existence; cause to be; produce,” which begs the question, will this be another staged and manufactured crisis like the 9/11 attacks, which occurred less than 8 months after Bush took office?

Now, with all of this information, when you see the people backing Obama and the people who Obama has been with ever since his career (Brzezinski was his mentor), when you see the people who decide for Obama and go so far as to select his running mate (the vice president), and when you see what they are “predicting” for us, do you have any hope for change now?

With regard to Brzezinski, read an article by Michael Ruppert here with some good insights. And on this link you can find some quotes from Brzezinski:

“Moreover, as America becomes an increasingly multi-cultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat.” (p. 211)

The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values (like liberty and democracy). Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.
– Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era, 1970

“In the technotronic society the trend would seem to be towards the aggregation of the individual support of millions of uncoordinated citizens, easily within the reach of magnetic and attractive personalities exploiting the latest communications techniques to manipulate emotions and control reason.”
– Between Two Ages : America’s Role in the Technetronic Era – 1970

Reading those quotes from 1970, it becomes clear that these people have been planning the global police state for many years now, and in 1970 already knew what today’s technology would enable them to do. How was this possible?

And finally, you might want to read this article titled: Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss. This part is very interesting:

The election of a new president should not be a mindless act of idolatry and fanfare, it should be a solemn commitment to find a leader who will follow the Constitution.

But Barack Obama will ride into office with a gigantic approval rating to rival that of Bush after 9/11, along with a complete power monopoly over the executive, the legislative, the judicial as well as widespread media support.

This makes Obama more dangerous than Bush and certainly a damn site more dangerous than a McCain administration, because his policies for at least a year or two will enjoy universal acclaim and voices of dissent will be drowned out by a wave of droning acquiescence.

Obama has all the political capital he needs to implement the terrifying policies that he has already announced and beef the architecture of the police state crafted by Bush.

It looks like with Obama, those in control have the perfect puppet through which to get their policies accepted by people. And before the people realize what’s going on, it will be already too late. This is the same situation that allowed the Patriot Act to get passed after 9/11, when Bush had so much support.

So again, do you still have any hope for change?


  1. Ainda Obama! Nunca seria candidato se não soubessem antes o que ele irá fazer « O Vigia (13/11/2008)
  2. Karel Donk » Blog Archive » The Obama Deception (16/04/2009)
  3. Karel Donk's Blog » Note To Barack Obama: GO FUCK YOURSELF! (21/11/2012)
  4. Karel Donk's Blog » Note 2 To Barack Obama: GO FUCK YOURSELF! (22/11/2013)


There are 10 responses. Follow any responses to this post through its comments RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.