<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows One Care</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.kareldonk.com/windows-one-care/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.kareldonk.com/windows-one-care/</link>
	<description>Software Engineer, Designer and Photographer in Suriname</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:10:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karel Donk &#187; Archive &#187; FireFox Security Getting Worse, Microsoft Improving</title>
		<link>http://blog.kareldonk.com/windows-one-care/#comment-1089</link>
		<dc:creator>Karel Donk &#187; Archive &#187; FireFox Security Getting Worse, Microsoft Improving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 15:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kareldonk.com/?p=25#comment-1089</guid>
		<description>[...] And it&#8217;s no surprise, because it is really lightweight and easy to use and requires little interaction while also being relatively cheap. Compare that to Symantec&#8217;s Norton Antivirus software, which is just slow and bloated. And I know, because I used it for many years. So I saw this coming way in advance: It?s going to be interesting to see what Microsoft comes up with regarding their antivirus solution. They have already proven to be quite capable of delivering an antispyware solution. Microsoft?s antispyware solution currently is the best solution available for Windows. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And it&#8217;s no surprise, because it is really lightweight and easy to use and requires little interaction while also being relatively cheap. Compare that to Symantec&#8217;s Norton Antivirus software, which is just slow and bloated. And I know, because I used it for many years. So I saw this coming way in advance: It?s going to be interesting to see what Microsoft comes up with regarding their antivirus solution. They have already proven to be quite capable of delivering an antispyware solution. Microsoft?s antispyware solution currently is the best solution available for Windows. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artan Duro</title>
		<link>http://blog.kareldonk.com/windows-one-care/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Artan Duro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 14:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kareldonk.com/?p=25#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with your options about Norton and Mcafee anti-virus programs and I have high expectations from Microsoft AV. But I dare recommend you for the time being to look at Etrust EZ Antivirus from CA (latest release 7.0.6.7 - 2005) . You&#039;ll never have to care about updating process which is fast and opening the program window.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with your options about Norton and Mcafee anti-virus programs and I have high expectations from Microsoft AV. But I dare recommend you for the time being to look at Etrust EZ Antivirus from CA (latest release 7.0.6.7 &#8211; 2005) . You&#8217;ll never have to care about updating process which is fast and opening the program window.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

