<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon&#8217;s DSLR division in trouble</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.kareldonk.com/canons-dslr-division-in-trouble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.kareldonk.com/canons-dslr-division-in-trouble/</link>
	<description>Software Engineer, Designer and Photographer in Suriname</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:44:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://blog.kareldonk.com/canons-dslr-division-in-trouble/#comment-3437</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 03:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kareldonk.com/?p=229#comment-3437</guid>
		<description>Being a Canon user makes me feel cheated. The autofocus is terrible, owning a $3000 camera and having so many shots out of focus is unacceptable. Shooting landscapes is most of the time fine (even there AF hunts at times)  but anything moving and easy to lose over 75% of your shots. Slow frame rate and many out of focus shots, bad news.  I have tried every AF combination and get the same results.  I have some great photos but have lost too many.  I hate to switch but selling my Canon gear and moving to Nikon. I would love to stay with Canon but AF issues are too much, and they don&#039;t seem wanting to fix it anytime soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a Canon user makes me feel cheated. The autofocus is terrible, owning a $3000 camera and having so many shots out of focus is unacceptable. Shooting landscapes is most of the time fine (even there AF hunts at times)  but anything moving and easy to lose over 75% of your shots. Slow frame rate and many out of focus shots, bad news.  I have tried every AF combination and get the same results.  I have some great photos but have lost too many.  I hate to switch but selling my Canon gear and moving to Nikon. I would love to stay with Canon but AF issues are too much, and they don&#8217;t seem wanting to fix it anytime soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karel Donk&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Canon EOS 7D Review: Noisier than 40D</title>
		<link>http://blog.kareldonk.com/canons-dslr-division-in-trouble/#comment-2965</link>
		<dc:creator>Karel Donk&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Canon EOS 7D Review: Noisier than 40D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kareldonk.com/?p=229#comment-2965</guid>
		<description>[...] and are not a defect / shortcoming of the autofocus system itself (like was the case with the 1D Mark III and 5D Mark II). At least I hope so for those of you who bought the camera. So should you choose to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and are not a defect / shortcoming of the autofocus system itself (like was the case with the 1D Mark III and 5D Mark II). At least I hope so for those of you who bought the camera. So should you choose to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: someguy6481</title>
		<link>http://blog.kareldonk.com/canons-dslr-division-in-trouble/#comment-2707</link>
		<dc:creator>someguy6481</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 17:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kareldonk.com/?p=229#comment-2707</guid>
		<description>Canon fanboys use certain tactics when the integrity of their equipment or their deity (Canon) is put into question. I have compiled a list of the most common apologetics and accusations:

- you don&#039;t know how to use your equipment.

- error 99&#039;s are a normal feature.

- Nikon have errors as well, so it&#039;s normal for Canon to have them.

- there is nothing wrong with the auto focusing system, it&#039;s your fault.

- quality control costs money (as mentioned previously).

- it&#039;s normal to recalibrate your lenses, even from a &quot;L&quot; range lens.

- lens hood are additional accessory and should be sold separately.

as we can see, circular reasoning and lying is a trait of the Canon fanboys and of Canon executive.

what I find most insulting is that a once great leader in photography will sell faulty DSLR cameras in exchange for your hard earned cash. Canon are seriously taking you for a bunch of fools, wake up people, there are alternatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canon fanboys use certain tactics when the integrity of their equipment or their deity (Canon) is put into question. I have compiled a list of the most common apologetics and accusations:</p>
<p>- you don&#8217;t know how to use your equipment.</p>
<p>- error 99&#8242;s are a normal feature.</p>
<p>- Nikon have errors as well, so it&#8217;s normal for Canon to have them.</p>
<p>- there is nothing wrong with the auto focusing system, it&#8217;s your fault.</p>
<p>- quality control costs money (as mentioned previously).</p>
<p>- it&#8217;s normal to recalibrate your lenses, even from a &#8220;L&#8221; range lens.</p>
<p>- lens hood are additional accessory and should be sold separately.</p>
<p>as we can see, circular reasoning and lying is a trait of the Canon fanboys and of Canon executive.</p>
<p>what I find most insulting is that a once great leader in photography will sell faulty DSLR cameras in exchange for your hard earned cash. Canon are seriously taking you for a bunch of fools, wake up people, there are alternatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karel Donk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Canon EOS 5D Mark II: Barely worth it!</title>
		<link>http://blog.kareldonk.com/canons-dslr-division-in-trouble/#comment-2205</link>
		<dc:creator>Karel Donk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Canon EOS 5D Mark II: Barely worth it!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kareldonk.com/?p=229#comment-2205</guid>
		<description>[...] be. Hopefully people won&#8217;t have to send their cameras back to Canon like happened during the recent 1D Mark III autofocus fiasco. You would think that Canon would have learned from all the quality control issues they have had [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be. Hopefully people won&#8217;t have to send their cameras back to Canon like happened during the recent 1D Mark III autofocus fiasco. You would think that Canon would have learned from all the quality control issues they have had [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karel Donk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Canon has lost it</title>
		<link>http://blog.kareldonk.com/canons-dslr-division-in-trouble/#comment-2175</link>
		<dc:creator>Karel Donk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Canon has lost it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kareldonk.com/?p=229#comment-2175</guid>
		<description>[...] you&#8217;ve been reading my blog, this was something that you could have expected. I wrote about Canon&#8217;s DSLR division being in trouble a few months ago. It&#8217;s only the logical [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you&#8217;ve been reading my blog, this was something that you could have expected. I wrote about Canon&#8217;s DSLR division being in trouble a few months ago. It&#8217;s only the logical [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: notabug</title>
		<link>http://blog.kareldonk.com/canons-dslr-division-in-trouble/#comment-2126</link>
		<dc:creator>notabug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 11:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kareldonk.com/?p=229#comment-2126</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a Olympus user and didn&#039;t realize how much I was spoiled on snappy/extremely fast and accurate AF until someday I tried a Canon40d. 

slow moving subject and me stand still and one of a couple shots there&#039;s a out of focus picture. totally unexpected.

turning back to my E3 +  Zuiko 12-60 SWD, I now know how lucky i am. On other specs and functionalities Nikon/Canon got higher ends products but just for AF, canon disappointed me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a Olympus user and didn&#8217;t realize how much I was spoiled on snappy/extremely fast and accurate AF until someday I tried a Canon40d. </p>
<p>slow moving subject and me stand still and one of a couple shots there&#8217;s a out of focus picture. totally unexpected.</p>
<p>turning back to my E3 +  Zuiko 12-60 SWD, I now know how lucky i am. On other specs and functionalities Nikon/Canon got higher ends products but just for AF, canon disappointed me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karel Donk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Canon EOS 5D Mark II - The Autofocus Lie</title>
		<link>http://blog.kareldonk.com/canons-dslr-division-in-trouble/#comment-2013</link>
		<dc:creator>Karel Donk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Canon EOS 5D Mark II - The Autofocus Lie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 00:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kareldonk.com/?p=229#comment-2013</guid>
		<description>[...] with their latest products. I have recently written about the EOS 50D and EOS 5D Mark II and a load of other problems with Canon&#8217;s DSLR division. And it appears we now have a reasonably certain cause of all these problems. And it is a problem [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with their latest products. I have recently written about the EOS 50D and EOS 5D Mark II and a load of other problems with Canon&#8217;s DSLR division. And it appears we now have a reasonably certain cause of all these problems. And it is a problem [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karel Donk &#187; Archive &#187; Canon EOS 50D: Not worth it. Save your money. - Part II</title>
		<link>http://blog.kareldonk.com/canons-dslr-division-in-trouble/#comment-1986</link>
		<dc:creator>Karel Donk &#187; Archive &#187; Canon EOS 50D: Not worth it. Save your money. - Part II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 12:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kareldonk.com/?p=229#comment-1986</guid>
		<description>[...] It is totally not worth it to upgrade to the 50D if you have a 40D or even a 30D. Nikon&#8217;s D90, which is also about $400 cheaper, would be a better alternative. Or the D300. Canon has really disappointed with this one. Even the autofocus in the 50D is the same as the 40D, and we all know that the 40D AI Servo performance is absolutely crap. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It is totally not worth it to upgrade to the 50D if you have a 40D or even a 30D. Nikon&#8217;s D90, which is also about $400 cheaper, would be a better alternative. Or the D300. Canon has really disappointed with this one. Even the autofocus in the 50D is the same as the 40D, and we all know that the 40D AI Servo performance is absolutely crap. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karel Donk</title>
		<link>http://blog.kareldonk.com/canons-dslr-division-in-trouble/#comment-1982</link>
		<dc:creator>Karel Donk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 22:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kareldonk.com/?p=229#comment-1982</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think I am biased against Canon. A low of things that I mention are also being said by others. In addition, I am a Canon shooter. However, like I said before, the fact that I use Canon hardware is only going to make me more critical when I discover issues, especially when I notice that they&#039;re not doing anything about it and are not improving. I&#039;m not going to remain quiet when I see the issues because I use and own their gear. Only fanboys do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think I am biased against Canon. A low of things that I mention are also being said by others. In addition, I am a Canon shooter. However, like I said before, the fact that I use Canon hardware is only going to make me more critical when I discover issues, especially when I notice that they&#8217;re not doing anything about it and are not improving. I&#8217;m not going to remain quiet when I see the issues because I use and own their gear. Only fanboys do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donk Donk</title>
		<link>http://blog.kareldonk.com/canons-dslr-division-in-trouble/#comment-1981</link>
		<dc:creator>Donk Donk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 21:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kareldonk.com/?p=229#comment-1981</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll have to admit the reviews are a little, ok very bias against Canon. It&#039;s just Nikon&#039;s time to shine, we&#039;ve spent 25 years behind Canon trying to catch up. We finally caught up and surpassed them.

Lets face it, Nikon has been in trouble for a very long time, especially when the Canon 5D came out. I&#039;m just glad we finally have our own 12 Megapixel Full Frame camera.

Lets see what Canon does next year, I hope Nikon keeps challenging them so both sides have good products. 

I don&#039;t think I&#039;ll be using this site to read up on anything new about Canon though haha. The bias is too uncontrolled and slightly makes Mr. Donk look insecure. If Mr. Donk is a Nikon user like me, then I would suggest that there is no need for such animosity. You might own both Nikon and Canon but you&#039;re also very transparent in which direction you lean. Making your reviews hard to read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll have to admit the reviews are a little, ok very bias against Canon. It&#8217;s just Nikon&#8217;s time to shine, we&#8217;ve spent 25 years behind Canon trying to catch up. We finally caught up and surpassed them.</p>
<p>Lets face it, Nikon has been in trouble for a very long time, especially when the Canon 5D came out. I&#8217;m just glad we finally have our own 12 Megapixel Full Frame camera.</p>
<p>Lets see what Canon does next year, I hope Nikon keeps challenging them so both sides have good products. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll be using this site to read up on anything new about Canon though haha. The bias is too uncontrolled and slightly makes Mr. Donk look insecure. If Mr. Donk is a Nikon user like me, then I would suggest that there is no need for such animosity. You might own both Nikon and Canon but you&#8217;re also very transparent in which direction you lean. Making your reviews hard to read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karel Donk &#187; Archive &#187; Canon EOS 5D Mark II: Not all it could have been</title>
		<link>http://blog.kareldonk.com/canons-dslr-division-in-trouble/#comment-1972</link>
		<dc:creator>Karel Donk &#187; Archive &#187; Canon EOS 5D Mark II: Not all it could have been</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 22:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kareldonk.com/?p=229#comment-1972</guid>
		<description>[...] the release of these cameras will be flawless. The products are already mediocre at best, and any quality control issues are going to significantly hurt them this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the release of these cameras will be flawless. The products are already mediocre at best, and any quality control issues are going to significantly hurt them this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karel Donk &#187; Archive &#187; Canon EOS 50D: Not worth it. Save your money.</title>
		<link>http://blog.kareldonk.com/canons-dslr-division-in-trouble/#comment-1958</link>
		<dc:creator>Karel Donk &#187; Archive &#187; Canon EOS 50D: Not worth it. Save your money.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 03:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kareldonk.com/?p=229#comment-1958</guid>
		<description>[...] we know better now. This is the same autofocus system the 40D has, and it&#8217;s been proven to be crap especially [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we know better now. This is the same autofocus system the 40D has, and it&#8217;s been proven to be crap especially [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ste</title>
		<link>http://blog.kareldonk.com/canons-dslr-division-in-trouble/#comment-1945</link>
		<dc:creator>Ste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kareldonk.com/?p=229#comment-1945</guid>
		<description>I was once a Canon user, but after many problems with both lenses i had either front or back focussing &amp; being sent of to be calibrated only to come back much worst &amp; 2 40D body later due one with the mirror falling out &amp; the other Er99 for no reason, I decided to sell up and move not to Nikon but Olympus with the simpler E-520 &amp; wonderful Zuiko 12-60mm SWD.

Im now actually enjoying Photography again and not worrying if the lens i buy is gonna give me focussing issuses, or if the body going to fall on me as both the body &amp; lenses i currently own from Olympus have been spot on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was once a Canon user, but after many problems with both lenses i had either front or back focussing &amp; being sent of to be calibrated only to come back much worst &amp; 2 40D body later due one with the mirror falling out &amp; the other Er99 for no reason, I decided to sell up and move not to Nikon but Olympus with the simpler E-520 &amp; wonderful Zuiko 12-60mm SWD.</p>
<p>Im now actually enjoying Photography again and not worrying if the lens i buy is gonna give me focussing issuses, or if the body going to fall on me as both the body &amp; lenses i currently own from Olympus have been spot on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oracle</title>
		<link>http://blog.kareldonk.com/canons-dslr-division-in-trouble/#comment-1944</link>
		<dc:creator>Oracle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 08:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kareldonk.com/?p=229#comment-1944</guid>
		<description>Every camera brand has its flaws. I&#039;m not a canon nor nikon user. A lot of my friends use Canon and Nikon and when they compare each others work, they don&#039;t see any difference at all. Canon claims to be no. 1 and so in Nikon. Both have to improve in their products and most importantly they shoud improve on aftersales services. 

Regardless of the camera I&#039;m using, I love photography and that&#039;s the bottomline.

...... but then again, if your company is promoting a flagship product then it must be really good. So far Canon has failed in this area :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every camera brand has its flaws. I&#8217;m not a canon nor nikon user. A lot of my friends use Canon and Nikon and when they compare each others work, they don&#8217;t see any difference at all. Canon claims to be no. 1 and so in Nikon. Both have to improve in their products and most importantly they shoud improve on aftersales services. </p>
<p>Regardless of the camera I&#8217;m using, I love photography and that&#8217;s the bottomline.</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230; but then again, if your company is promoting a flagship product then it must be really good. So far Canon has failed in this area <img src='http://blog.kareldonk.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: max2</title>
		<link>http://blog.kareldonk.com/canons-dslr-division-in-trouble/#comment-1941</link>
		<dc:creator>max2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kareldonk.com/?p=229#comment-1941</guid>
		<description>:mrgreen::mrgreen: I can&#039;t agree with you any more...

Canon need to improve themselves, the rumors say they will release new Bodies this month.
Just wait and see...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://blog.kareldonk.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif' alt=':mrgreen:' class='wp-smiley' /> :mrgreen: I can&#8217;t agree with you any more&#8230;</p>
<p>Canon need to improve themselves, the rumors say they will release new Bodies this month.<br />
Just wait and see&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karel Donk</title>
		<link>http://blog.kareldonk.com/canons-dslr-division-in-trouble/#comment-1940</link>
		<dc:creator>Karel Donk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kareldonk.com/?p=229#comment-1940</guid>
		<description>I shoot Canon as well, but it&#039;s not ging to stop me from talking about all the issues with them. They need to improve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I shoot Canon as well, but it&#8217;s not ging to stop me from talking about all the issues with them. They need to improve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Graph</title>
		<link>http://blog.kareldonk.com/canons-dslr-division-in-trouble/#comment-1939</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Graph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 03:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kareldonk.com/?p=229#comment-1939</guid>
		<description>Wow, dude, I think you might have just risen the art of fanboy to a new level?  You actually drug the 5D into this?  

It&#039;s your blog, so you roll how you will.

These are the facts.  Nikon has introduced some really nice products of late. Their attack on the upper end of the market this year has been definitive and has yielded fantastic results.  But it was a long time coming, wasn&#039;t it?  In the meantime, Canon has released two killer entry level DSLRs, for which Nikon has no answer, save their spiff programs at the retail level.

So, at Photokina, Canon will answer with some new high end stuff, bearing in mind that the highest of the high end dslr, the 1Ds Mark III, has yet to be challenged.  In turn, Nikon will bring the D90, and maybe announce the new D3 upgrade.  And all this will start again.

I shoot Canon.  My stuff is every bit as sharp as anyone&#039;s out there.  Guarantee it.  And I&#039;m not switching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, dude, I think you might have just risen the art of fanboy to a new level?  You actually drug the 5D into this?  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s your blog, so you roll how you will.</p>
<p>These are the facts.  Nikon has introduced some really nice products of late. Their attack on the upper end of the market this year has been definitive and has yielded fantastic results.  But it was a long time coming, wasn&#8217;t it?  In the meantime, Canon has released two killer entry level DSLRs, for which Nikon has no answer, save their spiff programs at the retail level.</p>
<p>So, at Photokina, Canon will answer with some new high end stuff, bearing in mind that the highest of the high end dslr, the 1Ds Mark III, has yet to be challenged.  In turn, Nikon will bring the D90, and maybe announce the new D3 upgrade.  And all this will start again.</p>
<p>I shoot Canon.  My stuff is every bit as sharp as anyone&#8217;s out there.  Guarantee it.  And I&#8217;m not switching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James McLaren</title>
		<link>http://blog.kareldonk.com/canons-dslr-division-in-trouble/#comment-1936</link>
		<dc:creator>James McLaren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kareldonk.com/?p=229#comment-1936</guid>
		<description>Good, Canon can finally go die now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good, Canon can finally go die now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blog.kareldonk.com/canons-dslr-division-in-trouble/#comment-1935</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kareldonk.com/?p=229#comment-1935</guid>
		<description>I was literally lied to by the Canon rep, I mailed my camera off for warranty work and sensor cleaning (To California), it came back totally not fixed and just thrown in a box , even the bubble wrap I sent them wasnt used. The camera still had time on the waranty and they wanted money to repair it. I am seriously thinking about switching my contacts to Nikon. Canon has a great product and don&#039;t care about it&#039;s customer service. I contacted Canon and they sent me an e-mail saying that they would contact me, three weeks later still no return call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was literally lied to by the Canon rep, I mailed my camera off for warranty work and sensor cleaning (To California), it came back totally not fixed and just thrown in a box , even the bubble wrap I sent them wasnt used. The camera still had time on the waranty and they wanted money to repair it. I am seriously thinking about switching my contacts to Nikon. Canon has a great product and don&#8217;t care about it&#8217;s customer service. I contacted Canon and they sent me an e-mail saying that they would contact me, three weeks later still no return call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garrinn</title>
		<link>http://blog.kareldonk.com/canons-dslr-division-in-trouble/#comment-1934</link>
		<dc:creator>garrinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kareldonk.com/?p=229#comment-1934</guid>
		<description>I must agree a lot. Canon are not doing their job. However, 5D is their best product so far. 40D is however with their worst ever. 

Let&#039;s talk about 40D. It&#039;s images are overally very soft. Then I mean very soft. It&#039;s like it lack great deal of sharpness. 

But the most defected thing about this camera is the fact it has a very stupid IQ and marketing issue. They do advertize it as a consumer camera. The settings on the main knob has a lot of fully automatic settings, but in every one of them, the AF-mode is 9-point mode. Mode which select focus closest to the camera with most contrast.

So when at least 50% af Canon 40D users take pictures, the focus is not on the subject, it&#039;s somewhere else where the camera choose to have it.

If this isn&#039;t stupid when produce a camera for consumer, what is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must agree a lot. Canon are not doing their job. However, 5D is their best product so far. 40D is however with their worst ever. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s talk about 40D. It&#8217;s images are overally very soft. Then I mean very soft. It&#8217;s like it lack great deal of sharpness. </p>
<p>But the most defected thing about this camera is the fact it has a very stupid IQ and marketing issue. They do advertize it as a consumer camera. The settings on the main knob has a lot of fully automatic settings, but in every one of them, the AF-mode is 9-point mode. Mode which select focus closest to the camera with most contrast.</p>
<p>So when at least 50% af Canon 40D users take pictures, the focus is not on the subject, it&#8217;s somewhere else where the camera choose to have it.</p>
<p>If this isn&#8217;t stupid when produce a camera for consumer, what is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pixel</title>
		<link>http://blog.kareldonk.com/canons-dslr-division-in-trouble/#comment-1931</link>
		<dc:creator>pixel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 03:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kareldonk.com/?p=229#comment-1931</guid>
		<description>You got to be kidding me about your opinions. LOL Suck bias and ignorant information coming from this site. Get your facts straight before claiming anything. Galbraith is not the &quot;GOD&quot; of Canon user. He just simply puts the MARK III too high above his MARK IIn. Sheesh 

IGNORANT AUTHOR!!!!!

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=554278</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You got to be kidding me about your opinions. LOL Suck bias and ignorant information coming from this site. Get your facts straight before claiming anything. Galbraith is not the &#8220;GOD&#8221; of Canon user. He just simply puts the MARK III too high above his MARK IIn. Sheesh </p>
<p>IGNORANT AUTHOR!!!!!</p>
<p><a href="http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=554278" rel="nofollow">http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=554278</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karel Donk</title>
		<link>http://blog.kareldonk.com/canons-dslr-division-in-trouble/#comment-1930</link>
		<dc:creator>Karel Donk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 02:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kareldonk.com/?p=229#comment-1930</guid>
		<description>They&#039;ve been resolved? You haven&#039;t read Galbraith&#039;s report then. As for Nikon, I have no experience with Nikon...yet. Even if Nikon was just as bad, this does not mean all this crap from Canon is normal and should be accepted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;ve been resolved? You haven&#8217;t read Galbraith&#8217;s report then. As for Nikon, I have no experience with Nikon&#8230;yet. Even if Nikon was just as bad, this does not mean all this crap from Canon is normal and should be accepted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://blog.kareldonk.com/canons-dslr-division-in-trouble/#comment-1929</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 02:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kareldonk.com/?p=229#comment-1929</guid>
		<description>You kidding me?
The Mk.III did come out with problems, but because of upgrades they&#039;ve been resolved, the same procedure happens with all software and hardware, nothing is released perfect you idiot. If you want to negativly critisize Canon you should do the same for Nikon because they are just as problematic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You kidding me?<br />
The Mk.III did come out with problems, but because of upgrades they&#8217;ve been resolved, the same procedure happens with all software and hardware, nothing is released perfect you idiot. If you want to negativly critisize Canon you should do the same for Nikon because they are just as problematic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: publicidad que canon no necesita - Canonistas.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.kareldonk.com/canons-dslr-division-in-trouble/#comment-1927</link>
		<dc:creator>publicidad que canon no necesita - Canonistas.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 23:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kareldonk.com/?p=229#comment-1927</guid>
		<description>[...] china un chino parece estar muy enojado con su EOS 1D mark 3 y ya sabemos todo porque esta enojado: Karel Donk Archive Canon&#8217;s DSLR division in trouble    __________________ &quot;Amateurs se preocupan por el equipo, los professionales se preocupan [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] china un chino parece estar muy enojado con su EOS 1D mark 3 y ya sabemos todo porque esta enojado: Karel Donk Archive Canon&#8217;s DSLR division in trouble    __________________ &quot;Amateurs se preocupan por el equipo, los professionales se preocupan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

